Browse by Year
/ 1998
/ March
/ Friday, March 20, 1998
[Federal Register: March 20, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 54)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13508-13510]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20mr98-15]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-22-AD; Amendment 39-10410]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320-111 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to certain Airbus Model A320-111 series airplanes. This
amendment requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking around the
attachment holes for the access panels in the lower skin of the wing;
and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of
mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil
airworthiness authority. The actions specified in this AD are intended
to detect and correct such cracking, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: Effective June 18, 1998.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 18, 1998.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before April 20, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-
[[Page 13509]]
22-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile
(DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified the
FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A320-111
series airplanes. The DGAC advises that it has received a report of
cracking detected during fatigue testing on a test article; the cracks
were found around the attachment holes for the access panels in the
lower skin of the wing, between ribs 13 and 22. Such cracking, if not
detected and corrected in a timely manner, could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-57-1056, Revision 1, dated
July 15, 1997, including Appendix 1, which describes procedures for
repetitive high frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracking
around the attachment holes for the access panels in the lower skin of
the wing, between ribs 13 and 22 (skin panel number 2, left and right
sides); and repair, if necessary. The DGAC classified this service
bulletin as mandatory and issued French airworthiness directive 97-083-
096(B), dated March 12, 1997, in order to assure the continued
airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
FAA's Conclusions
This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of
the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
Explanation of Requirements of Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered
in the United States, this AD is being issued to require accomplishment
of the actions specified in the service bulletin described previously,
except as discussed below.
Differences Between the Rule and the Service Information
Operators should note that, although the previously described
service bulletin specifies that the manufacturer may be contacted for
disposition of certain repair conditions, this AD requires the repair
of those conditions to be accomplished in accordance with a method
approved by the FAA.
Cost Impact
Currently, there are approximately 118 Airbus Model A320-111
airplanes of U.S. registry. However, the FAA has determined that none
of these U.S.-registered airplanes will be affected by this AD.
Therefore, there is no future economic cost impact of this rule on U.S.
operators.
Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S.
Register in the future, it would require approximately 8 work hours per
airplane to accomplish the required inspection, at an average labor
rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of
this AD would be $480 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The Direct Final Rule Procedure
The FAA anticipates that this regulation will not result in adverse
or negative comment and, therefore, is issuing it as a direct final
rule. The requirements of this direct final rule address and unsafe
condition identified by a foreign civil airworthiness authority and do
not impose a significant burden on affected operators. In accordance
with 14 CFR 11.17, unless a written adverse or negative comment, or a
written notice of intent to submit an adverse or negative comment, is
received within the comment period, the regulation will become
effective on the date specified above. After the close of the comment
period, the FAA will publish a document in the Federal Register
indicating that no adverse or negative comments were received; at that
time, the AD number will be specified, and the date on which the final
rule will become effective will be confirmed. If the FAA does receive,
within the comment period, a written adverse or negative comment, or
written notice of intent to submit such a comment, a document
withdrawing the direct final rule will be published in the Federal
Register, and a notice of proposed rulemaking may be published with a
new comment period.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not
preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are
invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this
rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may
desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket Number and be
submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption
ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date
for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light
of the comments received. Factual information that supports the
commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating
the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional
rulemaking action would be needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 98-NM-22-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
[[Page 13510]]
The FAA has determined that this regulation is noncontroversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. For reasons
discussed in the preamble, I certify that this regulation (1) Is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, will not have
a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at
the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Airbus: Amendment 39-10410. Docket 98-NM-22-AD.
Applicability: Model A320-111 series airplanes, as identified in
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1056, Revision 1, dated July 15,
1997, including Appendix 1; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct cracking around the attachment holes for
the access panels in the lower skin of the wing, between ribs 13 and
22 (skin panel number 2, left and right sides), which could result
in reduced structural integrity of the airplane, accomplish the
following:
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or
within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later: Perform a high frequency eddy current inspection to detect
cracking around the attachment holes for the access panels in the
lower skin of the wing, between ribs 13 and 22; in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1056, Revision 1, dated July 15,
1997, including Appendix 1. Thereafter, repeat the inspection at
intervals not to exceed 15,000 flight cycles.
(b) If any crack is detected during any inspection required by
this AD, and the applicable service bulletin specifies to contact
the manufacturer for an appropriate action: Prior to further flight,
repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate.
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1056, Revision 1, dated July 15, 1997, including
Appendix 1. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may
be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directive 97-083-096(B), dated March 12, 1997.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on June 18, 1998.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 11, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-6947 Filed 3-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Browse by Year
/ 1998
/ March
/ Friday, March 20, 1998
Credit Card Consolidation - Internet Marketing - Loans - Credit Cards
|
|