Browse by Year
/ 1998
/ March
/ Friday, March 20, 1998
[Federal Register: March 20, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 54)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13493-13495]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20mr98-7]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-NM-230-AD; Amendment 39-10409; AD 98-06-31]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300, A310, and A300-600
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Airbus Model A300, A310, and A300-600 series
airplanes, that requires inspections to detect cracking of the aft door
frame area, and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by
issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign
civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are
intended to detect and correct cracks in the aft door frame area, which
could result in reduced structural integrity and rapid decompression of
the airplane.
DATES: Effective April 24, 1998.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of April 24, 1998.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
[[Page 13494]]
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300, A310,
and A300-600 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
November 26, 1997 (62 FR 63039). That action proposed to require
inspections to detect cracking of the aft door frame area, and repair,
if necessary.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
One commenter supports the proposed rule.
Request To Cite Latest Service Bulletins
One commenter requests that the proposed AD be revised to cite the
latest revision of Airbus Service Bulletins A300-53-303, A310-53-2079,
and A300-53-6056. The commenter states that the related French
airworthiness directive (CN) 96-135-199(B) would be revised to include
the wording, ``SB . . . or any later approved revision.'' The commenter
points out that the latest revisions of the service bulletins include a
higher value for the acceptable cumulative crack length.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request to cite the
latest service bulletin. As stated in the proposal, although the
service bulletins, in certain circumstances, provide for continued
flight without immediate repair of the damage area, this AD does not
permit further flight with cracks detected in the aft door frame area.
The FAA has determined that, due to safety implications and
consequences associated with cracking in the aft door frame area, all
locations in the aft door frame area that are found to be cracked must
be repaired prior to further flight. In light of this, the FAA finds it
unnecessary to revise this final rule to cite the latest revisions of
the service bulletins to reference a higher value for crack length.
In addition, where a specific document is referenced in an AD, the
use of the phrase, ``or later FAA-approved revision,'' violates Office
of the Federal Register regulations regarding approval of material that
is incorporated by reference. However, affected operators may request
to use a later revision of the referenced service bulletins as an
alternative method of compliance, under the provisions of paragraph (d)
of the final rule.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 49 Airbus Model A300 and A310 series
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will
take approximately 25 work hours per airplane to accomplish the
required inspections, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the required
inspections on U.S. operators is estimated to be $73,500, or $1,500 per
airplane.
The FAA estimates that 51 Airbus Model A300-600 series airplanes of
U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take
approximately 18 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required
inspections, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour.
Based on these figures, the cost impact of the required inspections on
U.S. operators of Model A300-600 series airplanes is estimated to be
$55,080, or $1,080 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
98-06-31 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-10409. Docket 97-NM-230-AD.
Applicability: Model A300, A310, and A300-600 airplanes on which
Airbus Modification 6924 has not been installed; certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct cracks in the aft door frame area, which
could result in reduced structural integrity and possible rapid
decompression of the aircraft, accomplish the following:
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 10 years since date of
manufacture, or within 12 months after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later: Except as provided by paragraphs (b) and
(c) of this AD, accomplish a high frequency eddy current inspection
to detect stress corrosion cracks in the aft door frame area, and
perform the applicable corrective actions, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-53-303, dated February 23, 1996 (for Model
A300 series airplanes); A310-53-2079, dated February 23, 1996 (for
Model A310 series airplanes); or A300-53-6056, dated February 23,
1996 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes); subsequently referred to
as the applicable service bulletin. Thereafter, repeat the
inspection at intervals not to exceed 5 years, in all areas not
repaired permanently
[[Page 13495]]
in accordance with the applicable service bulletin.
(b) If any crack is found during an inspection required by
paragraph (a) of this AD, and the applicable service bulletin
specifies to contact Airbus for an appropriate action: Prior to
further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate.
(c) If any crack is found during an inspection required by
paragraph (a) of this AD, and the applicable service bulletin
specifies a compliance time other than ``prior to further flight''
for accomplishment of the repair: Accomplish the repair prior to
further flight in accordance with the procedures specified in the
applicable service bulletin.
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(f) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-53-303; Airbus Service Bulletin A310-53-2079; or
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6056, all dated February 23, 1996;
as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may
be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directive (CN) 96-135-199(B), dated July 17, 1996.
(g) This amendment becomes effective on April 24, 1998.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 11, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-6953 Filed 3-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Browse by Year
/ 1998
/ March
/ Friday, March 20, 1998
Bankruptcy - Loans - Credit Cards - Arizona Landscaping
|
|