Browse by Year
/ 1998
/ March
/ Friday, March 20, 1998
[Federal Register: March 20, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 54)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13566-13568]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20mr98-36]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-NM-59-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series
airplanes. This proposal would require an inspection to determine the
material type of the stop support fittings of the main entry doors. The
proposed AD also would require repetitive visual inspections to detect
cracks of certain stop support fittings of the main entry doors, and
replacement of any cracked stop support fitting with a certain new stop
support fitting. This proposal is prompted by reports that stress
corrosion cracking was found on certain stop support fittings of the
main entry doors. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended
to detect and correct such stress corrosion cracking, which could lead
to failure of the stop support fittings. Failure of the stop support
fittings could result in loss of a main entry door and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 4, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport
[[Page 13567]]
Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-NM-59-AD,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be
inspected at this location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Breneman, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2776; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 97-NM-59-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 97-NM-59-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
The FAA has received numerous reports of cracks on the stop support
fittings (made from either 7079-T651 or 7075-T651 material) of the
numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 main entry doors on Boeing Model 747 series
airplanes. The cause of these cracks has been attributed to stress
corrosion. The effects of such stress corrosion cracking, if not
detected and corrected in a timely manner, could lead to failure of the
stop support fittings. Failure of the stop support fittings could
result in loss of a main entry door and consequent rapid decompression
of the airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53-
2358, dated August 26, 1993, which describes procedures for performing
a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to determine the
material type of the stop support fittings of the main entry doors. The
service bulletin also describes procedures for repetitive visual
inspections to detect cracks of the stop support fitting (not made from
7075-T73 material) of the main entry doors, and replacement of any
cracked fitting with a new fitting made from 7075-T73 material. In
addition, the service bulletin describes procedures for optional
replacement of the stop support fittings of the main entry doors with
stop support fittings made from 7075-T73 material, which would
eliminate the need for repetitive inspections. The new stop support
fitting is less susceptible to stress corrosion cracking.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the
proposed AD would require an HFEC inspection to determine the material
type of the stop support fittings of the main entry doors. The proposed
AD also would require repetitive visual inspections to detect cracks of
the stop support fitting (not made from 7075-T73 material) of the main
entry doors, and replacement of any cracked fitting with a new fitting
made from 7075-T73 material. In addition, the proposed AD provides for
an optional replacement of the stop support fittings of the main entry
doors with stop support fittings made from 7075-T73 material, which
would constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements. The actions would be required to be accomplished in
accordance with the service bulletin described previously.
Differences Between the Proposal and the Relevant Service
Information
Operators should note that the proposed compliance time of 18
months for the repetitive inspections differs from the compliance time
recommended in the referenced service bulletin. In developing an
appropriate compliance time for this action, the FAA considered not
only the degree of urgency associated with addressing the subject
unsafe condition, but the susceptibility of the subject area to stress
corrosion cracking. In addition, the FAA finds that a compliance time
of 18 months will allow the inspection to be performed at a base during
regularly scheduled maintenance where special equipment and trained
maintenance personnel will be available, if necessary. In consideration
of these items, the FAA finds that repetitive visual inspections
conducted at the proposed compliance time of 18 months will better
ensure that any detrimental effect associated with stress corrosion
cracking will be identified and corrected prior to the time that it
could adversely affect the stop support fittings of the main entry
doors.
In addition, unlike the procedures described in the referenced
service bulletin, this proposed AD would not permit further flight with
cracking detected in the stop support fittings. The FAA has determined
that, due to the safety implications and consequences associated with
such cracking, all stop support fittings that are found to be cracked
must be replaced prior to further flight.
Furthermore, the FAA is not proposing to mandate the replacement of
stop support fittings for several reasons:
1. Accessing the stop support fittings for inspection is easily
accomplished.
2. The cracked stop support fittings are easily detectable by means
of a visual inspection.
3. The visual inspection will preclude the occurrence of multiple
failed stop support fittings, which could result in a catastrophic
failure.
The FAA also is not including the option for inspection at an
initial compliance time of 6 years since date of manufacture of the
airplane, as recommended by the referenced service bulletin. The FAA
has determined that all affected airplanes are older than 6 years since
date of manufacture of the airplane.
[[Page 13568]]
Other Relevant Rulemaking
The FAA has previously issued AD 92-02-01, amendment 39-8137 (57 FR
5373, February 14, 1992), which addresses cracking of certain support
fittings on Boeing Model 747 series airplanes having line numbers 001
through 113 inclusive. That AD currently requires repetitive
inspections for cracking of the doorstop support fittings at the
forward edge of the number 5 main entry door, and replacement, if
necessary.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 515 Boeing Model 747 series airplanes of
the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 164
airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD.
It would take approximately 1 work hour per door to accomplish the
proposed HFEC inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the HFEC inspection
proposed by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $60 per door.
Should an operator be required to accomplish the proposed visual
inspection, it would take approximately 2 work hours per door to
accomplish the proposed actions, at an average labor rate of $60 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the visual
inspection proposed by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$120 per door.
Should an operator elect to accomplish the optional terminating
action that would be provided by this proposed AD action, the number of
hours required to accomplish it would be approximately 124 work hours
per door, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts
would cost approximately $13,000 per door. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the optional terminating action on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $20,440 per door.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements
of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions
in the future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Boeing: Docket 97-NM-59-AD.
Applicability: Model 747-100, -100B, -200, -200B, -200C, -300, -
400, and 747SR series airplanes, having line numbers 1 through 830
inclusive; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct stress corrosion cracking of the stop
support fittings of the main entry doors and the resultant failure
of the stop support fittings, which could result in loss of a main
entry door and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane,
accomplish the following:
(a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a high frequency eddy current inspection to determine the
material type of the stop support fittings of the main entry doors,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53-2358, dated August 26, 1993.
(1) If the fitting is made from 7075-T73 material, no further
action is required by this AD.
(2) If the fitting is NOT made from 7075-T73 material, prior to
further flight, perform a visual inspection to detect cracks of the
stop support fitting of the main entry doors, in accordance with the
service bulletin.
(i) If no crack is detected, repeat the visual inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 18 months.
(ii) If any crack is detected, prior to further flight, replace
the fitting with a stop support fitting made from 7075-T73 material,
in accordance with the service bulletin.
(b) Replacement of the stop support fitting of the main entry
doors with a stop support fitting made from 7075-T73 material, in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53-2358, dated August
26, 1993, constitutes terminating action for the repetitive
inspection requirements of this AD for the replaced fitting.
(c) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
a stop support fitting made from either 7079-T651 or 7075-T651
material on any airplane.
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 13, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-7228 Filed 3-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Browse by Year
/ 1998
/ March
/ Friday, March 20, 1998
Credit Card Consolidation - Internet Marketing - Loans - Credit Cards
|
|