Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Wednesday, June 19, 2002
[Federal Register: June 19, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 118)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41619-41621]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19jn02-2]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Part 28
[Docket No. 02-10]
RIN 1557-AC05
International Banking Activities: Capital Equivalency Deposits
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The OCC is amending its regulation regarding the capital
equivalency deposits (CED) that foreign banks with Federal branches or
agencies must establish and maintain. The OCC is revising certain
requirements regarding CED deposit arrangements to increase flexibility
for, and reduce burden on, certain Federal branches and agencies, based
on a supervisory assessment of the risks presented by the particular
institution.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on June 19, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Clarke, Acting Assistant
Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, 202-874-5090;
or Carlos Hernandez, Senior International Advisor, International
Banking and Finance Division, 202-874-4730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 30, 2002, the OCC requested
comment on an interim rule amending part 28. 67 FR 4325. The interim
rule revised certain requirements regarding CED deposit arrangements to
increase flexibility and reduce burden by permitting the OCC to impose
deposit requirements based on the same supervision by risk approach
that it uses in its supervision of national banks. The interim rule
revised 12 CFR 28.15(d) to clarify that the OCC may vary the terms of a
CED Agreement (Agreement) based on the circumstances and supervisory
risks present at a particular branch or agency. For example, an
Agreement may permit a foreign bank to withdraw assets from its CED
account, thereby reducing the net value of the assets held in the
account without OCC approval, as long as the withdrawal does not reduce
the value below the minimum CED level required for that institution.
Moreover, it may not be necessary in all cases for a foreign bank to
pledge its CED assets to the OCC or for the depository bank to be a
signatory to the Agreement unless required by the OCC. The OCC stated
that it will make these determinations on a case-by-case basis,
[[Page 41620]]
consistent with its supervisory assessment of the risks presented by
the particular institution.
The interim rule became effective immediately, but the OCC invited
public comment on any aspect of the interim rule.
Description of Comments Received and Final Rule
The OCC received two comments. One comment strongly supported the
revisions reflected in the interim rule. The commenter stated that the
interim rule should alleviate the administrative burden associated with
calculating, monitoring, and managing the CED requirement. The
commenter also supported the incorporation of the risk-based approaches
to regulation and supervision of international banking institutions
into the CED requirement.
The second commenter stated that to some readers the rule could
raise a question of whether the rule means that some foreign
institutions would not be required to maintain a CED in the statutory
minimum amount of five percent of liabilities. The proposed rule stated
that the CED ``[m]ay not be reduced in value below the minimum required
for that branch or agency without the prior approval of the OCC.'' The
final rule clarifies that in no event could the OCC approve a reduction
that is less than the statutory minimum for the particular Federal
branch or agency.
For these reasons, the OCC is adopting the interim rule in final
form without change, except for this clarification.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the OCC certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The rule will affect few small entities. The principal effect of the
rule is to remove several requirements with respect to deposit
arrangements for the CED and reduce burden on qualifying foreign banks
with Federal branches and agencies.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L.
104-4 (Unfunded Mandates Act) requires that an agency prepare a
budgetary impact statement before promulgating a rule that includes a
Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year. If a budgetary impact statement is
required, section 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Act also requires an
agency to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives before promulgating a rule. The OCC has determined that
the rule will not result in expenditures by State, local, or tribal
governments or by the private sector of $100 million or more.
Accordingly, the OCC has not prepared a budgetary impact statement or
specifically addressed the regulatory alternatives considered.
Executive Order 12866
The OCC has determined that this rule does not constitute a
``significant regulatory action'' for the purposes of Executive Order
12866.
Immediate Effective Date
The final rule is effective immediately. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
agencies may issue a rule without public notice and comment when the
agency, for good cause, finds that such notice and public comment are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. Section
553 also permits agencies to issue a rule without delaying its
effectiveness if the agency finds good cause for the immediate
effective date.
The OCC finds good cause to issue this rule without a delayed
effective date. Like the interim rule, the final rule will enable the
OCC to make determinations on a case-by-case basis, consistent with its
supervisory assessment of the risks presented by a particular
institution. These determinations will relate to whether a foreign bank
should continue to be required to pledge its CED assets to the OCC or
to obtain the OCC's approval to reduce the aggregate value of the CED
assets by withdrawal. These requirements may not be necessary for
safety and soundness reasons for most highly rated foreign banks, and
they, therefore, may impose unnecessary cost and burden. Elimination of
needless resulting cost and burden warrants making this rule effective
immediately so that qualifying foreign banks that do not pose safety or
soundness issues may take advantage of its benefits immediately.
Subject to certain exceptions, 12 U.S.C. 4802(b)(1) provides that
new regulations and amendments to regulations prescribed by a Federal
banking agency that impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other
new requirements on an insured depository institution must take effect
on the first day of a calendar quarter that begins on or after the date
on which the regulations are published in final form. Like the interim
rule, the final rule imposes no additional reporting, disclosure, or
other new requirements on insured depository institutions. Instead it
removes restrictions for qualifying foreign banks with Federal branches
and agencies. For this reason, section 4802(b)(1) does not apply to
this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The OCC may not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not
required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
The information collection requirements contained in 12 CFR part 28
have been approved under OMB control number 1557-0102.
The information collection requirements contained in this rule are
contained in section 28.15(d). Under this section as amended, capital
equivalency deposits may not be reduced in value below the minimum
required for that branch or agency without prior OCC approval, and
Federal branches and agencies are required to maintain records.
Estimated number of respondents: 35.
Estimated number of responses: 35.
Estimated burden hours per response: 1 hour.
Estimated number of recordkeepers: 35.
Estimated number of recordkeeping burden hours: 35.
Estimated total burden hours: 35.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 28
Foreign banking, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the OCC amends part 28
of chapter I of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 28--INTERNATIONAL BANKING ACTIVITIES
1. The authority citation for part 28 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 24(Seventh), 93a, 161, 602,
1818, 3101 et seq., and 3901 et seq.
2. In Sec. 28.15, paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) are revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 28.15 Capital equivalency deposits.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) May not be reduced in value below the minimum required for that
branch or agency without the prior approval of the OCC, but in no event
below the statutory minimum;
[[Page 41621]]
(2) Must be maintained pursuant to an agreement prescribed by the
OCC that shall be a written agreement entered into with the OCC for
purposes of section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C.
1818; and
* * * * *
Dated: June 12, 2002.
John D. Hawke, Jr.,
Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 02-15429 Filed 6-18-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Wednesday, June 19, 2002
Debt Consolidation - Arizona Pools - Internet Marketing - Loans
|
|