Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Tuesday, June 25, 2002
[Federal Register: June 25, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 122)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42723-42726]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25jn02-10]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01-02-069]
RIN 2115-AA97
Regulated Navigation Area; Kill Van Kull Channel, Newark Bay
Channel, South Elizabeth Channel, Elizabeth Channel, Port Newark
Channel and New Jersey Pierhead Channel, New York and New Jersey
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending a Regulated Navigation Area (RNA)
to add restrictions on vessels transiting the Bergen Point West Reach
of the Kill Van Kull during U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dredging
operations in that area. This action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life and property on navigable waters during dredging
operations that impinge upon the navigable portion of the channel and
require the temporary relocation of navigational aids. This action is
intended to reduce the risks of collisions, groundings and other
navigational mishaps.
DATES: This rule is effective from June 17, 2002 to March 30, 2003.
Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 26, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The Waterways Oversight Branch of Coast Guard Activities New
York maintains the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents indicated in
this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket
CGD01-02-069 and are available for inspection or copying at Waterways
Oversight Branch, Coast Guard Activities New York, 212 Coast Guard
Drive, room 203, Staten Island, New York 10305, between 8 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander C. Nichols,
Vessel Traffic Service, Coast Guard Activities New York at (718) 354-
4191.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for
[[Page 42724]]
this rulemaking (CGD01-02-069), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your comments and material to the Coast Guard
at the address under ADDRESSES. If you submit them by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them
by mail and would like to know they reached the Coast Guard, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period.
We may change this rule in view of them.
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553 (b)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers is conducting an extensive navigation improvement project in
Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay, New York and New Jersey. The project,
which is being conducted in nine distinct phases, began in April 1999
and will continue through approximately April 2005. In anticipation of
the project and its probable impact on navigation, the Coast Guard
worked with local pilots and maritime users to develop restrictions on
vessels transiting the area during dredging operations. As a result of
that cooperative process, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) in the Federal Register (63 FR 72219) on December 31, 1998,
discussing our intention to establish a Regulated Navigation Area (RNA)
for Kill Van Kull Channel, Newark Bay Channel, South Elizabeth Channel,
Elizabeth Channel, Port Newark Channel and New Jersey Pierhead Channel,
New York and New Jersey. We received no letters commenting on the
proposed rule. No public hearing was requested and none was held. On
April 15, 1999, we published a Final Rule in the Federal Register (64
FR 18577) codifying the RNA at 33 CFR 165.165.
Now that dredging operations have begun in the Bergen Point portion
of the navigation improvement project, it has become evident that the
existing RNA is insufficient to ensure the interests of safe navigation
on that portion of the waterway. On May 16, 2002, Kill Van Kull Channel
Lighted Buoys 10 and 12 (LLNR 37300 and 37310) and Bergen Point Lighted
Buoy 14 (LLNR 37325) had to be relocated to facilitate dredging of the
Kill Van Kull. Since these buoys were relocated, the Bergen Point Buoy
has been hit and moved off-station requiring Coast Guard assets to be
diverted from other safety and security missions in the Port of New
York and New Jersey while re-establishing the buoy on-station. More
importantly, other vessels have been unable to navigate within the
temporary channel boundaries. More than half of the vessels over 700
feet long transiting this area were unable to safely navigate the
narrow southern channel during periods of high current and moderate
winds. And there have been several near collisions between tugs and
barges operating in the area. Unless additional regulations are
established for vessels operating in the vicinity of Bergen Point, the
likelihood of similar future mishaps will increase as continued
dredging operations impinge upon the navigable portion of the channel.
In light of the foregoing, we have determined that immediate action
is required to establish additional regulations for vessels operating
in the vicinity of Bergen Point while U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
dredging operations continue. These circumstances provide good cause
for not publishing an NPRM. Similarly, the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay encountered in this
rule's effective date would be unnecessary and contrary to public
interest since immediate action is needed to restrict commercial vessel
transits in the waterway and protect the maritime public from the
hazards associated with changing vessel traffic patterns during this
dredging project.
Background and Purpose
The United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Port Authority of
New York/New Jersey commenced an extensive channel-dredging project in
the Kill Van Kull in April 1999. On May 16, 2002, Kill Van Kull Channel
Lighted Buoys 10 and 12 (LLNR 37300 and 37310) and Bergen Point Lighted
Buoy 14 (LLNR 37325) were relocated to facilitate dredging of the
Bergen Point West Reach of the Kill Van Kull. Since these buoys were
relocated, one vessel collided with the Bergen Point Buoy and moved it
off-station requiring Coast Guard assets to be diverted from other
safety and security missions in the Port of New York and New Jersey
while re-establishing the buoy on its assigned location. More than half
of the vessels over 700 feet long transiting this area were unable to
safely navigate the narrow southern channel during periods of high
current and moderate winds. Instead, they had to depart from the
temporary boundaries of the channel and proceed through a portion of
the closed area north of the Kill Van Kull Lighted Buoy 10. There have
also been several near collisions between tugs and barges in this area.
In order to protect life, property and the marine environment, the
Coast Guard is establishing the following additional requirements for
commercial vessels transiting Bergen Point West Reach of the Kill Van
Kull:
Tug Requirements: All vessels 350 feet in length, or greater,
excluding tugs with tows, require one assist tug. All vessels 700 feet
in length, or greater, excluding tugs with tows, require two assist
tugs. All vessels 900 feet in length, or greater, excluding tugs with
tows, require three assist tugs.
Tidal Current Restrictions: Vessels 700 feet in length, or greater,
are restricted to movements within one hour before or after slack
water, as measured from the Bergen Point current station.
Astern Tows: Hawser tows are not permitted unless an assist tug
accompanies the tow.
Wind Conditions: In sustained winds from 20 to 34 knots: (1) Cargo
ships may not transit; (2) tankers in ballast may not transit; (3) tugs
pushing or towing alongside tank barges 350 feet in length, or greater,
in light condition, require an assist tug. In sustained winds greater
than 34 knots, vessels 300 gross tons or greater and all tugs with tows
are prohibited from transiting.
Nearly identical restrictions were imposed during a previous
dredging project conducted in the same area from 1991 to 1992. They
were instituted after three groundings, which resulted in one oil spill
and one channel blockage. In anticipation of the current dredging
project, the Coast Guard worked closely with local pilots and
commercial waterway users to devise a system of regulations that would
reduce the likelihood of similar mishaps from recurring. We sought to
determine whether less restrictive regulations could be developed that
would adequately ensure the interests of safe navigation. After
extensive consultation, computer simulations and other analysis, we
concluded that the regulations codified at 33 CFR 165.165 would
adequately protect the interests of safe navigation in the vicinity of
Bergen Point during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers navigation
improvement project. As previously discussed, recent, actual experience
with those regulations demonstrates the need for these additional
restrictions on
[[Page 42725]]
commercial vessels operating in that area. Vessel Traffic Service New
York has already met with Pilots and Tug companies operating in the
port to explain the need for these restrictions. These restrictions
will be in place until March 30, 2003. They will be cancelled if
dredging operations in the vicinity of Bergen Point conclude before
that date.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation
(DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of the regulatory
policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary. This finding is based on
the fact that the overwhelming majority of vessels transiting through
the Bergen Point portion of the Kill Van Kull that would be required by
this rule to utilize tug assistance are already employing that service
as a matter of prudence; only those vessels not observing this ``best
practice'' will be affected. Vessels 700 feet in length, or greater,
could encounter slight delays while awaiting optimal tidal currents.
Those delays can be mitigated or avoided by appropriate arrival and
departure planning. The actual impact of this rule is minimal insofar
as each of the provisions of this rule could be imposed, on a case-by-
case basis, upon individual vessels transiting through Bergen Point
under Vessel Traffic Services New York's existing authority to
establish VTS Measures pursuant to 33 CFR 161.11. Rather than rely upon
ad hoc measures, we believe that the maritime public is better served
by having advance, certain knowledge of these requirements to
facilitate ready-reference and planning. Advance notifications will be
made to the local maritime community by the Local Notice to Mariners,
marine information broadcasts, and at New York Harbor Operations
Committee meetings.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or operators of commercial vessels
intending to transit Bergen Point West Reach of the Kill Van Kull. This
RNA will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities for the following reasons: Kill Van Kull accommodates
approximately 26,000 vessels transits annually; the overwhelming
majority of vessels that would be required to utilize tug assistance
while transiting the Bergen Point portion of the Kill Van Kull are
already employing that service as a matter of prudence; only the small
percentage of vessels not observing this ``best practice'' will be
affected by this regulation; we know of no specific small entities
among that small number. Any small entities that might be affected by
this rule are invited to submit comments, which may result in
modifications to the rule.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), the Coast Guard wants to
assist small entities in understanding this final rule so that they can
better evaluate its potential effects on them and participate in the
rulemaking. If your small business or organization would be affected by
this rule and you have questions concerning its provisions or options
for compliance, please call Lieutenant Commander C. Nichols, Vessel
Traffic Service, Coast Guard Activities New York at (718) 354-4191.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance, with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct cost of compliance on them.
We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it
does not have implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
[[Page 42726]]
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that Order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have considered the environmental impact of this rule and
concluded that, under figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g), of Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, this rule is categorically excluded from further
environmental documentation. This rule fits paragraph 34(g) as it
revises a Regulated Navigation Area. A ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or copying
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g),
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
2. From June 17, 2002 to March 30, 2003, amend Sec. 165.165 to add
paragraph (d)(10) to read as follows:
Sec. 165.165 Regulated Navigation Area; Kill Van Kull Channel, Newark
Bay Channel, South Elizabeth Channel, Elizabeth Channel, Port Newark
Channel and New Jersey Pierhead Channel, New York and New Jersey
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(10) Bergen Point West Reach. In addition to the requirements in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(9) of this section, the following
provisions apply to vessels transiting in or through Work Areas (4) and
(5):
(i) Tug requirements. All vessels 350 feet in length, or greater,
excluding tugs with tows, require one assist tug. All vessels 700 feet
in length, or greater, excluding tugs with tows, require two assist
tugs. All vessels 900 feet in length, or greater, excluding tugs with
tows, require three assist tugs.
(ii) Tidal current restrictions. Vessels 700 feet in length, or
greater, are restricted to movements within one hour before or after
slack water, as measured from the Bergen Point current station.
(iii) Astern tows. Hawser tows are not permitted unless an assist
tug accompanies the tow.
(iv) Sustained winds from 20 to 34 knots. In sustained winds from
20 to 34 knots:
(A) cargo ships and tankers in ballast may not transit Work Areas
(4) and (5);
(B) tugs pushing or towing alongside tank barges 350 feet in
length, or greater, in light condition, require an assist tug in Work
Areas (4) and (5).
(v) Sustained winds greater than 34 knots. In sustained winds
greater than 34 knots, vessels 300 gross tons or greater and all tugs
with tows are prohibited from transiting Work Areas (4) and (5).
Dated: June 17, 2002.
V.S. Crea,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 02-15967 Filed 6-24-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Tuesday, June 25, 2002
Credit Cards - Arizona Pools - Arizona Landscaping - Guitar Lessons
|
|