Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Friday, June 28, 2002
[Federal Register: June 28, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 43629-43632]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn02-76]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-4023-FN]
RIN 0938-ZA16
Medicare Program; Medicare+Choice Organizations--Approval of the
Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. (AAAHC) for
Medicare+Choice (M+C) Deeming Authority of M+C Organizations That Are
Licensed as Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) or Preferred
Provider Organizations (PPOs)
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final notice announces the approval of the Accreditation
Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. (AAAHC) for deeming
authority of Medicare+Choice (M+C) organizations that are licensed as
health maintenance organizations (HMOs) or preferred provider
organizations (PPOs). We have found that the AAAHC's standards for
managed care plans submitted to us and amended during the application
process, meet or exceed those established by the Medicare program.
Therefore, M+C organizations that are licensed as HMOs or PPOs and are
accredited by AAAHC may receive, at their request, deemed status for
the M+C requirements in the six areas--Quality Assurance, Information
on Advance Directives, Antidiscrimination, Access to Services, Provider
Participation Rules, and Confidentiality and Accuracy of Enrollee
Records--that are specified in section 1852(e)(4)(B) of the Social
Security Act (the Act).
Regulations set forth in Sec. 422.157(b)(2) specify that the
Secretary will publish a Federal Register notice that indicates whether
an accreditation organization's request for approval has been granted
and the effective date and term of the approval, which may not exceed 6
years.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trisha Kurtz, (410) 786-4670.
I. Background
Under the Medicare program, eligible beneficiaries may receive
covered services through a managed care organization that has a
Medicare+Choice (M+C) contract with us. To enter into an M+C contract,
the organization must be licensed by the State as a risk-bearing entity
and must meet the requirements that are set forth in 42 CFR part 422.
Those regulations implement Part C of Title XVIII of the Social
Security Act (the Act), that specifies the services that a managed care
organization must provide and the requirements that the organization
must meet to be an M+C contractor. Other relevant sections of the Act
are Parts A and B of Title XVIII and Part A of Title XI pertaining to
the provision of services by Medicare certified providers and
suppliers.
Following approval of the M+C contract, we engage in routine
monitoring of the M+C organization to ensure continuing compliance. The
monitoring process is comprehensive and uses a written protocol that
specifies the Medicare requirements the M+C organization must meet.
A M+C organization may be exempt from our monitoring of the
requirements that are in the areas listed in section 1852(e)(4)(B) of
the Act if the organization is accredited by a CMS-approved accrediting
organization. In essence, the Secretary ``deems'' that the Medicare
requirements are met based on
[[Page 43630]]
a determination that the accrediting organization's standards are at
least as stringent as Medicare requirements. Regulations for the M+C
deeming program are set forth in Secs. 422.156, 422.157, and 422.158.
The term for which we may approve an accrediting organization may not
exceed 6 years as stated in Sec. 422.157(b)(2). For continuing
approval, the accrediting organization will have to re-apply to us.
II. Provisions of the Proposed Notice
On August 1, 2001, we published a proposed notice in the Federal
Register (66 FR 39773) announcing the receipt of an application from
AAAHC for approval of deeming authority for M+C organizations that are
licensed as health maintenance organizations (HMOs) or preferred
provider organizations (PPOs). In the proposed notice, we provided the
factors on which we would base our evaluation. In accordance with
Sec. 422.157(b)(1)(iii) of the M+C regulations, we provided a 30-day
public comment period. We received one public comment in support of
AAAHC's application for M+C deeming authority.
III. Deeming Approval Review and Evaluation
As set forth in section 1852(e)(4) of the Act and our regulations
at Sec. 422.158, the review and evaluation of the AAAHC's accreditation
program (including their standards and monitoring protocol) were
compared to the requirements set forth in part 422 for the M+C program.
A. Components of the Review Process
The review of AAAHC's application for approval of M+C deeming
authority included the following components.
1. Site Visit
We conducted a site visit to AAAHC's headquarters to assess--
The corporate policies and procedures that relate to the
managed care accreditation program;
The survey, decision-making, and report-writing processes
used in AAAHC's managed care accreditation program;
The resources available for accreditation reviews and
AAAHC's ability to financially sustain an M+C deeming program;
The staff and surveyor training and evaluation programs;
The communication, customer support, and public
accessibility of accreditation information; and
AAAHC's ability to investigate and respond appropriately
to complaints against accredited managed care organizations.
2. Desk-Top Review
We conducted a desk-top review of AAAHC's managed care
accreditation program, including--
A description of AAAHC's survey process for managed care
plans, including the frequency of surveys performed, whether the
surveys are announced or unannounced, surveyor instructions, the review
and accreditation status decision-making process, procedures used to
notify accredited M+C organizations of deficiencies and monitoring of
the correction of deficiencies, and the procedures used to enforce
compliance with accreditation requirements;
Information about the individuals who perform network
accreditation reviews, including the size and composition of the survey
team, the methods of compensation, the education and experience
requirements, the content and frequency of the in-service training, the
evaluation system used to monitor performance, and conflict of interest
requirements governing AAAHC staff and surveyors;
A description of the data management and analysis system,
the types (full, partial, or denial) and categories (provisional,
conditional, temporary) of accreditation offered by AAAHC, the duration
of each category of accreditation, and a statement identifying the
types and categories that would serve as a basis for accreditation, if
we grant AAAHC M+C organization deeming authority;
The procedures used to respond to and investigate
complaints or identify other problems with accredited organizations,
including coordination of these activities with licensing bodies and
ombudsmen programs;
A description of how AAAHC provides accreditation
information to the general public;
The policies and procedures for (1) withholding, denying
and removing accreditation status, and the other actions AAAHC may take
in response to noncompliance with their standards and requirements, and
(2) how AAAHC treats accreditation of organizations that are acquired
by another organization, have merged with another organization, or that
undergo a change of ownership or management;
Lists of all (1) AAAHC-accredited M+C organizations, (2)
managed care plans surveyed by AAAHC in the past 3 years, and (3)
managed care plans that were scheduled to be surveyed by AAAHC within 3
months of submitting their application;
A written presentation of AAAHC's ability to furnish data
electronically, via telecommunications;
A resource analysis that included financial statements for
the past 3 years (audited, if possible) and the projected number of
deemed status surveys for the upcoming year; and
A statement acknowledging that, as a condition of
approval, AAAHC agreed to comply with the ongoing responsibility
requirements stated in Sec. 422.157(c).
3. Assessment of AAAHC's Standards and Methods of Evaluation
As part of the application, AAAHC submitted a crosswalk that
compared its standards and methods of evaluations with corresponding
M+C requirements. A multicomponent team of our regional and central
office staff then reviewed and evaluated AAAHC's standards and
processes and compared them to the M+C requirements in six areas:
Quality Assurance, Access to Services, Antidiscrimination, Information
on Advance Directives, Provider Participation Rules, and
Confidentiality and Accuracy of Enrollee Records.
4. Observation of a AAAHC Accreditation Survey
An observation of an AAAHC accreditation survey of a managed care
organization allowed our staff to (1) validate that the accreditation
review methods described in AAAHC's application were equal to (or
exceeded) the corresponding Medicare requirements, and (2) resolve
outstanding issues that were identified during the review of AAAHC's
application materials.
B. Results of the Review Process
We determined that AAAHC's current accreditation program for
managed care plans either did not address or did not ``meet or exceed''
several of the M+C requirements contained in the six categories set
forth in section 1852(e)(4)(C) of the Act. To address this issue, AAAHC
agreed to complement their current managed care accreditation program.
Thus, when assessing M+C organizations that seek deemed status for the
Medicare requirements contained in the six categories established in
the Act (including delegation requirements, which are contained in five
of the six deeming categories), AAAHC will add the requirements
described below.
1. Quality Assurance (Sec. 422.152)
AAAHC will add to its accreditation standards requirements for M+C
organizations to--
[[Page 43631]]
Conduct quality improvement projects that meet or exceed
the requirements specified in Sec. 422.152;
Achieve and report minimum performance levels when we
establish them;
Designate a policymaking body and senior official that are
accountable for the quality assurance program and that encourage
providers and consumers to participate actively;
Collect data related to (1) acute and chronic conditions
as related to preventive services and care outcomes, (2) the use of
clinical resources for high volume services, and (3) the availability,
accessibility, and cultural competency of services;
Select quality indicators that are objective, clearly
defined, based upon current research, and generally used in the public
health community. Indicators must be measured over time, monitored for
at least 1 year after the desired level of performance is achieved
(sustained improvement), and benchmarked to targets if we specify
targets;
Correct significant systemic problems that come to their
attention through internal surveillance, complaints, enrollee
satisfaction surveys, or other mechanisms, such as the use of appeals
and grievances; and
Evaluate the effectiveness of the quality assurance
program strategy on an annual basis and modify as necessary.
2. Provider Participation Rules (42 CFR Part 422 Subpart E)
AAAHC will add to its accreditation standards requirements for M+C
organizations to--
Provide written notice of rules of participation regarding
terms of payment, credentialing, participation decisions that are
adverse to physicians and material changes in participation rules
before changes are put into effect;
Provide at least 60 days written notice (applies to
provider as well) before terminating a contract without cause;
Establish a formal mechanism to consult with physicians
regarding medical policy, quality assurance programs, and medical
management procedures;
Communicate practice guidelines and any admission,
continued stay, and discharge criteria to all providers and enrollees
when appropriate;
Apply participation procedures equally to physicians
within all contracted subgroups;
Address notice requirements when suspending or terminating
physician agreements;
Communicate a physician's right to appeal a suspended or
terminated agreement and ensure that the hearing panel is composed of
members who are peers of the affected physician;
Address procedures for initial credentialing (including
verification for Medicare payment and attestation by the applicant of
the completeness of the application) and for recredentialing (time
frame) that are consistent with the Medicare requirements;
Determine and redetermine that the institutional provider
or supplier is licensed to operate in the State and is approved for
participation in Medicare (if applicable) and that the M+C organization
does not employ or contract with providers who have been excluded from
the Medicare program;
Enable providers to communicate treatment options to all
Medicare beneficiaries;
Make available information on the plan's policies about
objecting to cover, furnish, or pay for a particular service on the
basis of moral or religious reasons; and
Provide for limitations on provider indemnification that
is stated in Sec. 422.212.
AAAHC agreed to a Physician Incentive Plan (PIP) review strategy
that we proposed. M+C organizations will continue to provide PIP
information directly to us. We will notify AAAHC when a M+C
organization that they have deemed is ``noncompliant'' for any of the
PIP requirements; AAAHC will then contact the M+C organization to
inform it that it must comply with the PIP provisions. If, at the end
of the accrediting organization's corrective action process, the M+C
organization continues to be noncompliant, the accrediting organization
will refer the case to us.
3. Information on Advance Directives (Sec. 422.128)
AAAHC will add to its accreditation standards requirements for M+C
organizations to--
Maintain written policies and procedures on advance
directives;
Give information to patients (directly or by contracting
with other entities) regarding advance directives that (1) are written,
(2) address the right to accept or refuse treatment and formulate
advance directives, and (3) reflect changes in State law within 90 days
of the effective date;
Comply with State laws that allow the provider to decline
care that conflicts with an advance directive and to conscientiously
object to implementing certain advance directives; and
Inform individuals that complaints concerning
noncompliance with the advance directive requirements may be filed with
the State survey and certification agency.
4. Antidiscrimination (Sec. 422.110, Sec. 422.502(h))
AAAHC will add to its accreditation standards requirements for M+C
organizations to--
Prohibit the denial, limitation, or conditioning of
coverage or benefits to eligible enrollees on the basis of any factor
that relates to health status, except in the case of an individual with
end-stage renal disease;
Implement procedures to ensure that enrollees are not
discriminated against in the delivery of services or that health care
professionals are not discriminated against on the basis of license or
certification;
Furnish written notice (with a reason for the decision) to
any provider whose application for participation in a network has been
declined; and
Comply with all applicable laws and regulations related to
discrimination and payment sources.
5. Access to Services (Sec. 422.112)
AAAHC will add to its accreditation standards requirements for M+C
organizations to--
Instruct enrollees regarding their right to access
emergency health care services without prior authorization when the
enrollee determines need based upon a prudent layperson standard;
Offer a panel of primary care providers and arrange for
necessary specialty care, including women's health services;
Ensure that services are provided in a culturally
competent manner to all enrollees and that the organization establishes
standards for timeliness of access to care and member services that
meet or exceed any related standards that we may establish;
Ensure that each enrollee has an ongoing source of primary
care or that each enrollee has been offered a primary care source and
that, for each enrollee who accepts the offer, a primary care source
exists;
Provide coordination-of-care programs that include (1) an
initial health care needs assessment and a follow-up process, (2)
policies regarding ongoing coordination of care by primary care
providers or other means, (3) procedures for the identification of, and
treatment plans for, individuals with complex or serious needs, and (4)
coordination of plan services with community and social services; and
[[Page 43632]]
Transmit information about services used by the enrollee
to their primary care provider when a point of service or nonnetwork
benefit is offered.
6. Delegation Requirements (Contained in Five of the Six Deeming
Categories)
AAAHC will ensure that M+C organizations oversee and are
accountable for any functions or responsibilities that are described in
the standards for which AAAHC receives deeming authority, if the area
(or standard) is delegated to another entity.
C. Term of Approval
Regulations at Sec. 422.157(b)(2) permit us to grant a term of
approval for deeming authority for accreditation organizations of up to
6 years. On June 15, 2002, we notified AAAHC of our approval of their
application as a national accreditation organization for managed care
plans that request participation in the M+C program. We are granting
this deeming authority for 4 years--from June 15, 2002 through June 14,
2006.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The requirements associated with granting and withdrawal of deeming
authority to national accreditation organization, codified in part 422,
Medicare+Choice Program, are currently approved by OMB under OMB
approval number 0938-0690, with an expiration date of September 30,
2002. Consequently, this notice does not need to be reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the authority of the PRA.
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impact of this notice as required by Executive
Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review) and the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) September 19, 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary,
to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects;
distributive impacts; and equity).
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
for small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies.
Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers are small
entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $5
million to $25 million or less in any 1 year (for details, see the
Small Business Administration's publication that set forth size
standards for health care industries at 65 FR 69432). For purposes of
the RFA, States and individuals are not considered small entities.
Also, section 1102(b) of the Act requires the Secretary to prepare
a regulatory impact analysis for any notice that may have a significant
impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. Such an analysis must conform to the provisions of section
604 of the RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we consider
a small rural hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a
Metropolitan Statistical Area and has fewer than 100 beds.
This notice merely recognizes AAAHC as a national accreditation
organization that has approval for deeming authority for HMOs or PPOs
that are participating in the M+C program. Since M+C organizations are
monitored every 2 years by CMS's regional office staff to determine
compliance with M+C requirements, we believe that the M+C deeming
program has the potential to reduce both the regulatory and
administrative burdens associated with the Medicare+Choice program. In
FY 2001, there were 179 M+C contracts and 5,578,605 enrollees.
Approximately 6 of those M+C organizations were accredited by AAAHC.
This notice, however, is not a major rule as defined in Title 5, United
States Code, section 804(2) and is not an economically significant rule
under Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, we have determined, and the Secretary certifies, that
this notice will not result in a significant impact on small entities
and will not have an effect on the operations of small rural hospitals.
Therefore, we are not preparing analyses for either the RFA or section
1102(b) of the Act.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in expenditure in any 1 year by State,
local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $110 million. This notice has no consequential effect on
State, local, or tribal governments. We believe the private sector
costs of this notice fall below this threshold as well.
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this notice will not
significantly affect the rights of States and does not significantly
affect State authority.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
notice was not reviewed by OMB.
Authority: Secs. 1851 and 1855 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1395w-21 and 42 U.S.C. 1395w-25)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773,
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: May 12, 2002.
Thomas A. Scully,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 02-15971 Filed 6-27-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Friday, June 28, 2002
Bankruptcy - Debt Consolidation - Credit Card Consolidation - Loans
|
|