Federal Register Search  
   Home |  FREE Email Alerts (NEW!) |  1998 |  1999 |  2000 |  2001 |  2002 |  2003 |  2004 |  2005 |  2006 |  2007 |  2008

Browse by Year / 2002 / June / Monday, June 03, 2002
[Federal Register: June 3, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 106)]
[Notices]               
[Page 38265-38267]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03jn02-44]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC02-71-000, et al.]

 
American Transmission Systems, Incorporated, et al.; Electric 
Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

May 24, 2002.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. American Transmission Systems, Incorporated, PJM Interconnection, 
L.L.C.

[Docket Nos. EC02-71-000 and ER02-1865-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002 pursuant to Section 203 of the FPA 
and part 33 of the Commission's regulations, American Transmission 
Systems, Incorporated (ATSI) and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) 
filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), a 
joint application for approval of the transfer by ATSI of operational 
control over certain of its jurisdictional transmission facilities to 
PJM (Transfer). Pursuant to section 205 of the FPA and part 35 of the 
Commission's regulations, PJM filed three agreements related to the 
Transfer.
    Copies of this filing were served upon all members of PJM and the 
state electric utility regulatory commissions within the PJM region.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

[[Page 38266]]

2. San Diego Gas and Electric Company, Complainant v. Sellers of Energy 
and Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California 
Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange, 
Respondents, California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket Nos. EL00-95-001 and Docket No. ER02-1656-001]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing in the above-captioned 
dockets errata to its proposals for a Comprehensive Market Redesign 
filed on May 1, 2002. The ISO requests that certain elements of the 
errata filing be made effective on July 1, 2002 and others on October 
1, 2002. The ISO states that this filing has been served on the 
California Public Utilities Commission, all California ISO Scheduling 
Coordinators, and all parties in Docket No. EL00-95 and ER02-1656.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

3. Ameren Services Company

[Docket No. ER02-929-001]

    Take notice that on May 22, 2002, Ameren Services Company (Ameren 
Services), as agent for Central Illinois Public Service Company (d/b/a 
AmerenCIPS) and Union Electric Company (d/b/a AmerenUE), submitted a 
revised unexecuted service agreement for Network Integration 
Transmission Service and a revised unexecuted Network Operating 
Agreement with Citizens Electric Corporation (CEC), the customer under 
the proposed agreements. Ameren Services requests an effective date of 
January 1, 2002 for these agreements.
    A copy of the filing was served upon CEC and the affected state 
commissions.
    Comment Date: June 12, 2002.

4. Central Maine Power Company

[Docket No. ER02-1277-001]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Central Maine Power Company 
(Central Maine) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission), pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, its 
first-revised version of the executed S.D. Warren Somerset Entitlement 
Agreement. Central Maine originally submitted this agreement for filing 
with the Commission on February 19, 2002 and requested confidential 
treatment for certain material contained in the agreement that the 
parties considered sensitive business information. On May 6, 2002, the 
Commission issued a letter order conditionally accepting the agreement, 
but rejecting Central Maine's request for confidential treatment of 
certain portions of the contract, as well as requiring compliance with 
Order No. 614. The Commission ordered Central Maine to file non-
confidential versions of the agreement within fifteen days of the 
issuance of that order. Accordingly, Central Maine Power Company has 
timely re-filed a non-confidential version of the agreement, which the 
Commission has designated as FERC Rate Schedule No. 148.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

5. Tampa Electric Company

[Docket No. ER02-1858-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Tampa Electric Company (Tampa 
Electric) tendered for filing Original Sheet No. 14A for inclusion in 
its First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 16, the agreement for 
interchange service between Tampa Electric and the Kissimmee Utility 
Authority (Kissimmee). Tampa Electric states that the material on the 
tendered sheet was inadvertently left out when the rate schedule was 
reformatted in accordance with Order No. 614.
    Tampa Electric proposes that Original Sheet No. 14A be made 
effective on August 1, 2001, and therefore requests waiver of the 
Commission's prior notice requirement. Tampa Electric states that 
copies of the filing have been served on Kissimmee and the Florida 
Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

6. Duke Energy Corporation

[Docket No. ER02-1859-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Duke Energy Corporation filed 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a notice of 
cancellation for Service Agreements Nos. 139 and 140 under its FERC 
Electric Tariff No. 4, effective date July 31, 1999.
    This notice of the proposed cancellation has been served on the 
parties on the Commission's official service list in these proceedings.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

7. Tampa Electric Company

[Docket No. ER02-1860-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Tampa Electric Company (Tampa 
Electric) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) service agreements with American Electric Power 
Service Corporation (AEP) for firm point-to-point transmission service 
and non-firm point-to-point transmission service under Tampa Electric's 
open access transmission tariff.
    Tampa Electric proposes an effective date of May 21, 2002, for the 
tendered service agreements, and therefore requests waiver of the 
Commission's notice requirement. Copies of the filing have been served 
on AEP and the Florida Public Service Commission.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

8. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER02-1861-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Midwest Independent Transmission 
System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) pursuant to Section 205 of the 
Federal Power Act and Section 35.13 of the Commission's regulations, 
Service Agreements for the transmission service requested by Marshfield 
Electric & Water Department.
    A copy of this filing was sent to Marshfield Electric & Water 
Department.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

9. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

[Docket No. ER02-1862-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Midwest Independent Transmission 
System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) pursuant to Section 205 of the 
Federal Power Act and Section 35.13 of the Commission's regulations, 
Service Agreements for the transmission service requested by 
Independence Light & Power, Telecommunications.
    A copy of this filing was sent to Independence Light & Power, 
Telecommunications.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

10. West Texas Utilities Company

[Docket No. ER02-1863-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, West Texas Utilities Company 
(WTU) submitted for filing a restated and amended Interconnection 
Agreement between WTU and Taylor Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Taylor) 
that supersedes, in its entirety, the Interconnection Agreement between 
WTU and Taylor, dated January 1, 2000. The only changes to the 
Interconnection Agreement are the addition of a new point of 
interconnection to be established near Taylor's new Potosi Substation 
and administrative changes to reflect that WTU is an operating company 
of the American Electric Power System.
    WTU seeks an effective date of June 18, 2002 for the 
Interconnection Agreement, and, accordingly, seeks waiver of the 
Commission's notice requirements. WTU served copies of the

[[Page 38267]]

filing on Taylor and the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

11. Delmarva Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER02-1864-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Delmarva Power & Light Company 
(Delmarva) tendered for filing an Interconnection Agreement between 
Delmarva and Conectiv Delmarva Generation, Inc. (CDG). The 
Interconnection Agreement provides for the interconnection of CDG's 
generating facilities with the Delmarva transmission system.
    Delmarva respectfully requests that the Interconnection Agreement 
become effective on July 21, 2002. Copies of the filing were served 
upon the Delmarva Public Service Commission, Maryland Public Service 
Commission and the Virginia State Corporation Commission.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

12. Desert Southwest Power, LLC

[Docket No. ER02-1866-000]

    Take notice that on May 21, 2002, Desert Southwest Power, LLC 
submitted a Notice of Succession pursuant to 18 CFR 35.16 and 131.51 of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Regulations. Caithness 
Energy Marketing, LLC has changed its name to Desert Southwest Power, 
LLC and effective April 23, 2002 succeeded to Caithness Energy 
Marketing, LLC Rate Schedule FERC No. 1, Market-Based Rate Schedule 
filed in Docket No. ER01-2353-000, which was effective July 15, 2001.
    Comment Date: June 11, 2002.

Standard Paragraph

    E. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing 
should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent 
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person 
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for 
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket 
'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-13776 Filed 5-31-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Browse by Year / 2002 / June / Monday, June 03, 2002
Loans - United Specialties - Renegade Motorhomes - Credit Counseling
Search

Recent Registers
January 8, 2009
January 7, 2009
January 6, 2009
January 5, 2009
January 2, 2009
December 31, 2008
December 30, 2008
December 29, 2008

  Home |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2010 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.
Web Doodle, LLC does not provide legal advise.