Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Monday, June 03, 2002
[Federal Register: June 3, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 38276-38279]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03jn02-51]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPP-2002-0078; FRL-7179-2]
Notice of Filing a Pesticide Petition to Establish a Tolerance
for a Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on Food
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide
petition proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of a
certain
[[Page 38277]]
pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket control number OPP-2002-0078,
must be received on or before July 3, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by mail, electronically, or in
person. Please follow the detailed instructions for each method as
provided in Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that you identify docket
control number OPP-2002-0078 in the subject line on the first page of
your response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Shaja Brothers, Registration
Support Branch, Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (703) 308-3194 and e-mail
address: brothers.shaja@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be affected by this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of
Categories NAICS codes potentially
affected entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry 111 Crop production
112 Animal production
311 Food manufacturing
32532 Pesticide
manufacturing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this
Document and Other Related Documents?
1. Electronically. You may obtain electronic copies of this
document, and certain other related documents that might be available
electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/.
To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and
Regulations,'' ``Regulations and Proposed Rules,'' and then look up the
entry for this document under the ``Federal Register''--Environmental
Documents. You can also go directly to the Federal Register listings at
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for
this action under docket control number OPP-2002-0078 official record
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any
public comments received during an applicable comment period, and other
information related to this action, including any information claimed
as confidential business information (CBI). This official record
includes the documents that are physically located in the docket, as
well as the documents that are referenced in those documents. The
public version of the official record does not include any information
claimed as CBI. The public version of the official record, which
includes printed, paper versions of any electronic comments submitted
during an applicable comment period, is available for inspection in the
Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119,
Crystal Mall 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA,
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments through the mail, in person, or
electronically. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket control number OPP-2002-0078 in the subject line on
the first page of your response.
1. By mail. Submit your comments to: Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Information Resources and Services Division
(7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
2. In person or by courier. Deliver your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Information Resources
and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1921
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA. The PIRIB is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
3. Electronically. You may submit your comments electronically by
e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov, or you can submit a computer disk as
described above. Do not submit any information electronically that you
consider to be CBI. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Electronic submissions will be accepted in Wordperfect 6.1/
8.0 or ASCII file format. All comments in electronic form must be
identified by docket control number OPP-2002-0078. Electronic comments
may also be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.
D. How Should I Handle CBI That I Want to Submit to the Agency?
Do not submit any information electronically that you consider to
be CBI. You may claim information that you submit to EPA in response to
this document as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as
CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance
with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete
version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as
CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public version of the
official record. Information not marked confidential will be included
in the public version of the official record without prior notice. If
you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI,
please consult the person identified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this
notice.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
control number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first
page of your
[[Page 38278]]
response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register
citation.
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has received a pesticide petition as follows proposing the
establishment and/or amendment of regulations for residues of a certain
pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities under section 408
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a.
EPA has determined that this petition contains data or information
regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has
not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time
or whether the data support granting of the petition. Additional data
may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed
additives, Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 17,2002.
Robert Forrest,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Summary of Petition
The petitioner summary of the pesticide petition is printed below
as required by section 408(d)(3) of the FFDCA. The summary of the
petition was prepared by the Interregional Research Project Number 4,
and represents the view of the Interreional Research Project. EPA is
publishing the petition summary verbatim without editing it in any way.
The petition summary announces the availability of a description of the
analytical methods available to EPA for the detection and measurement
of the pesticide chemical residues or an explanation of why no such
method is needed.
PP 1E6322
EPA has received a pesticide petition (1E6322) from the
Interregional Research Project Number 4, 681 U.S. Highway 1 South,
North Brunswick, New Jersey 08902-3390] proposing, pursuant to section
408(d) of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR 180.479 by
establishing a tolerance for residues of the herbicide [halosulfuron,
methyl 5-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl) amino]carbonylaminosulfonyl-3-
chloro-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxylate] in or on the raw
agricultural commodities (RAC) dry bean and succulent snap bean at 0.05
parts per million (ppm). EPA has determined that the petition contains
data or information regarding the elements set forth in section
408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the
sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data
support granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before
EPA rules on the petition. This notice includes a summary of the
petition prepared by Gowan Company, Yuma, Arizona 85366.
A. Residue Chemistry
1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism of halosulfuron-methyl as well
as the nature of the residues in plants is adequately understood for
purposes of this tolerance.
2. Analytical method. A practical analytical method, gas
chromatography with a nitrogen specific detector (TSD) which detects
and measures residues of halosulfuron-methyl, is available for
enforcement purposes with a limit of detection that allows monitoring
of food with residues at or above the levels set in these tolerances.
This enforcement method has been submitted to the Food and Drug
Administration for publication in the Pesticide Analytical Manual (PAM
II). It has undergone independent laboratory validation and validation
at the Beltsville laboratory.
3. Magnitude of residues. In snap and dry bean residue studies,
there were no quantifiable residues found in the RAC using an
analytical method with limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.05 ppm.
B. Toxicological Profile
The nature of the toxic effects caused by halosulfuron-methyl is
discussed in unit II.B of the Federal Register on April 31, 2001 (66 FR
45993) (FRL-6796-1).
C. Aggregate Exposure
1. Dietary exposure. Tolerances have been established (40 CFR
180.479) for residues of halosulfuron-methyl in or on a variety of
plant and animal RACs.
i. Food-- a. Acute exposure. For purposes of assessing the
potential dietary exposure from food under existing and proposed
tolerances, the aggregate exposure is based on the Theoretical Maximum
Residue Contribution (TMRC) which is an estimate of the level of
residues consumed daily if each food item contained pesticide residues
equal to the tolerance.
The calculated TMRC value using the 99.9th percentile
consumption data was 0.006 milligrams/kilograms bodyweight day (mg/kg
bwt day) or 1.2% acute Reference Dose (aRfD) for the general U.S.
population. TMRC is obtained by multiplying the tolerance levels for
each commodity by the daily consumption of the food forms of that
commodity eaten by the U.S. population and various population
subgroups.
In conducting this exposure assessment, conservative assumptions
were made resulting in a large overestimate of human exposure. Thus,
the dietary exposures to halosulfuron-methyl are less 3.0% aRfD for all
sub-populations. Food consumption data from DEEM software were used in
the calculation.
b. Chronic exposure. The chronic Reference Dose (cRfD) is 0.1 mg/
kg/day. For all established and proposed tolerances of halosulfuron-
methyl, the calculated TMRC value for the U.S. population is 0.00049
mg/kg/day or 0.5% RfD.
ii. Drinking water. The estimated environmental concentrations
(EECs) in ground water (acute and chronic) is 0.008 [mu]g/L. The
estimated EECs (acute and chronic) for surface water are 4.3 [mu]g/L
and 1.1 [mu]g/L, respectively. These estimates are based on a maximum
application rate of 0.063 lbs. active per acre, which may be applied
twice per season. There is no Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
established for residues of halosulfuron-methyl.
2. Non-dietary exposure. The non-dietary exposure assessment for
halosulfuron-methyl is discussed in unit II.C of the Federal Register
on April 31, 2001 (66 FR 45993) (FRL-6796-1).
D. Cumulative Effects
The potential for cumulative effects for halosulfuron-methyl is
discussed in unit II.D of the Federal Register on April 31, 2001 (66 FR
45993) (FRL-6796-1).
E. Safety Determination
1. U.S. population. Aggregate chronic exposure to halosulfuron-
methyl from ``food only'' utilizes less than 1% of the chronic
populated adjusted dose (cPAD) for the most sensitive subgroup,
children (1-6 years). The lowest drinking water level of concern
(DWLOC) calculated was 1,000 [mu]g/L for infants and children which is
significantly higher than the EEC for chronic ground water (0.008
[mu]g/L) and surface water (1.1 [mu]g/L). As a result, the aggregate
risk from chronic exposure to halosulfuron-methyl residues from all
anticipated dietary exposures does not pose appreciable risks to human
health.
Short-term risk--short-term aggregate exposure takes into account
chronic dietary food and water plus short-term residential exposure.
For halosulfuron-methyl, the EPA has determined that it is appropriate
to aggregate exposure via
[[Page 38279]]
oral exposure route (food and water) with those via oral and dermal
exposure routes from residential uses. The MOEs for ``food only'' and
residential exposure routes are 113, 600, and 330 for females 13+
years. Short-term DWLOC for females 13+ is 10,000 [mu]g/L which is
substantially higher than the EECs for acute surface water (4.3 [mu]g/
L). The food only and residential (oral and dermal) MOEs are well above
the acceptable short-term aggregate MOE of 100. Therefore, exposure to
halosulfuron-methyl residues resulting from current and proposed uses
does not pose a short-term aggregate risk.
Intermediate-term risk--intermediate-term aggregate exposure takes
into account chronic dietary food and water plus intermediate-term
residential exposure. The MOEs for ``food only'' and residential
exposure routes are 22,800 and 120 for adult males, and 23,000 and 100
for females 13+ years. The intermediate-term DWLOCs are 590 [mu]g/L and
57 [mu]g/L, respectively, for adult males and females 13+.
Intermediate-term DWLOCs are substantially higher than the EEC for
chronic surface water (1.1 [mu]g/L). The food only and residential
(dermal) MOEs are above the acceptable short-term aggregate MOE of 100.
Therefore, exposure to halosulfuron-methyl residues resulting from
current and proposed uses does not pose a intermediate-term aggregate
risk.
Halosulfuron-methyl has been classified as a Group E chemical
based upon the lack of evidence of carcinogenicity in mice and rats,
and has been classified as not likely to be a human carcinogen.
Therefore based upon this risk assessment, there is reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to
halosulfuron-methyl residues resulting from current and proposed uses.
2. Infants and children. FFDCA section 408 provides that EPA may
apply an additional safety factor (up to 10) in the case of threshold
effects for infants and children to account for pre-natal and post-
natal toxicity and the completeness of the data base. Except for the
pending request for a developmental neurotoxicity study, the toxicity
data base is complete for halosulfuron-methyl.
The chronic RfD was determined to be 0.1 mg/kg/day based upon the
chronic dog study. The percent of RfD occupied is 0.9% for the most
sensitive population subgroup, children (1-6 years old). The DWLOC for
chronic exposure for infants and children is 1,000 [mu]g/L and is
significantly greater than the maximum concentration of halosulfuron-
methyl in drinking water (0.008 [mu]g/L in ground water and 1.1 [mu]g/L
in surface water).
Based upon reliable toxicity data, the use of an additional 10X
safety factor is not warranted. Dietary assessments do not indicate a
level of concern for potential risks to infants and children based upon
the low use rates of halosulfuron-methyl, and the results of field and
animal RAC studies conclude that detectable residues are not expected
in human foods.
Therefore, based on complete and reliable toxicity data and the
conservative exposure assessment, it is concluded that there is
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to halosulfuron-methyl residues with respect to
the proposed new uses on dry and succulent snap beans.
F. International Tolerances
Maximum residue levels have not been established for residues of
halosulfuron-methyl on any food or feed crop by the Codex Alimentarius
Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-13814 Filed 5-31-02 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Monday, June 03, 2002
Credit Card Consolidation - Credit Cards - Renegade Motorhomes - Loans
|
|