Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Wednesday, June 05, 2002
[Federal Register: June 5, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 108)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38608-38609]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05jn02-8]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 020409080-2134-03; I.D. 052402C]
RIN 0648-AP78
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS publishes this interim final rule to amend the
regulations governing the Northeast multispecies fishery to bring them
into compliance with a Court Order. On May 23, 2002, the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia (Court) issued an Order in
Conservation Law Foundation, et al. v. Evans, et al., which granted the
motions for reconsideration submitted to the Court by NMFS and several
other parties to the lawsuit in response to the Court's April 26, 2002,
Remedial Order. In granting the motion for reconsideration, the Court
ordered NMFS to implement, by June 1, 2002, an amended interim rule to
bring the regulations into conformance with the Settlement Agreement
Among Certain Parties (Settlement Agreement) that was filed earlier
with the Court. Therefore, NMFS is making the following changes to the
regulations: The year-round Cashes Ledge East and Cashes Ledge West
Area Closures (blocks 128 and 130) are removed; the requirement to use
a minimum of 6-inch (15.2-cm) spacing between the fairlead rollers of
de-hooking gear (``crucifiers'') is removed; and the minimum fish size
for cod that may be lawfully sold is decreased from 22 inches (55.9 cm)
to 19 inches (28.3 cm).
DATES: Effective June 1, 2002, except for an amendment to Sec. 648.83
paragraph (a)(3), which is effective from June 1, 2002, through July
31, 2002. Comments on this interim final rule must be received no later
than 5 p.m., local time, on July 5, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to Patricia A. Kurkul,
Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, One
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the
envelope, ``Comments on the June Interim Final Rule for Groundfish.''
Comments also may be sent via facsimile (fax) to (978) 281-9135.
Comments will not be accepted if submitted via e-mail or Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Warren, Fishery Policy Analyst,
phone: 978-281-9347, fax: 978-281-9135; email: thomas.warren@noaa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 28, 2001, a decision was rendered by the Court on a
lawsuit brought by the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF), Center for
Marine Conservation, National Audubon Society and Natural Resources
Defense Council against NMFS (Conservation Law Foundation, et al., v.
Evans, Case No. 00CVO1134, (D.D.C., December 28, 2001)). The lawsuit
alleged that Framework Adjustment 33 to the Fishery Management Plan for
the Northeast Multispecies Fishery (FMP) violated the overfishing,
rebuilding and bycatch provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (18 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended by
the Sustainable Fisheries Act (SFA). The Court granted Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts. The Court had not yet
imposed a remedy, but it did ask the parties to the lawsuit to propose
remedies consistent with the Court's findings. Additional background on
the lawsuit is contained in the preamble to the interim rules published
by NMFS on April 29, 2002 (67 FR 21140) and May 6, 2002 (67 FR 30331)
and is not repeated here.
From April 5-9, 2002, Plaintiffs, Defendants and Intervenors
engaged in Court-assisted mediation to try to agree upon mutually
acceptable short-term and long-term solutions to present to the Court
as a possible settlement. Although these discussions ended with no
settlement, several of the parties continued mediation and filed with
the Court a Settlement Agreement on April 16, 2002. In addition to
NMFS, the parties signing the agreement include CLF, which is one of
the plaintiff conservation groups, all four state intervenors, and two
of three industry intervenors.
In order to ensure the implementation of protective management
measures by May 1, 2002, NMFS, notwithstanding that the Court had not
yet issued its Remedial Order, filed an interim final rule with the
Office of the Federal Register on April 25, 2002, for publication on
April 29, 2002. The interim final rule that was published on April 29,
2002, implemented measures identical to the short-term measures
contained in the Settlement Agreement filed with the Court.
On April 26, 2002, the Court issued a Remedial Order that ordered
the promulgation of two specific sets of management measures--one to be
effective from May 1, 2002, to July 31, 2002, and the other from August
1, 2002, until promulgation of Amendment 13 to the FMP. The Court-
ordered measures for the first set of measures were, in the majority,
identical with those contained in the Settlement Agreement and the
measures contained in NMFS' April 29, 2002, interim final rule.
However, the Court-ordered measures included additional provisions and
an accelerated schedule of effectiveness for all measures, which were
not contained in either the Settlement Agreement or the April 29, 2002,
interim final rule. According to the Court, these additional provisions
were included to strengthen the Settlement Agreement provisions ``in
terms of reducing overfishing and minimizing bycatch without risking
the lives of fishermen or endangering the future of their communities
and their way of life'' (Remedial Order, p.13). Further, the Court
ordered that NMFS publish in the Federal Register, as quickly as
possible, an ``amended interim rule and an amended second interim
rule'' that would ``include the departures from the Settlement
Agreement incorporated in the Remedial Order.'' To comply with the
Court Order, NMFS published a second interim final rule (``amended
interim rule'') to modify the measures implemented through the April
29, 2002, interim final rule and to accelerate the effectiveness of the
gear restrictions, as required by the Remedial Order.
Because the Court's Remedial Order was not entirely consistent with
the terms of the Settlement Agreement, NMFS, CLF, and the Intervenors
filed motions for reconsideration with the Court, requesting that the
Court implement the terms of the Settlement Agreement without change.
On May 23, 2002, the Court issued an Order granting the motions for
reconsideration on the basis that ``the important changes made by the
Court in the complex and carefully crafted Settlement Agreement
[[Page 38609]]
Among Certain Parties ... would produce unintended consequences.'' The
Court ordered that the Settlement Agreement be implemented according to
its terms; that the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) publish an
interim rule, effective no later than June 1, 2002, to reduce
overfishing in the first quarter of the 2002-2003 fishing year; that
the Secretary publish another interim rule to be effective no later
than August 1, 2002, to reduce overfishing beginning with the second
quarter of the 2002-2003 fishing year, and continuing until
implementation of Amendment 13 to the FMP, which complies with the
overfishing, rebuilding, and bycatch provisions of the SFA; and that,
no later than August 22, 2003, the Secretary promulgate such an
amendment to the FMP.
Changes to Management Measures
Through this interim final rule, NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary,
makes the changes ordered by the Court to be implemented by June 1,
2002, and thus brings the regulations governing the Northeast
multispecies fishery into full conformance with the terms of the
Settlement Agreement. Specifically, three measures that were not in the
Settlement Agreement, but that were ordered by the April 26, 2002,
Remedial Order and implemented by the May 6, 2002, interim final rule,
are removed from the regulations. They are:
1. The year-round Cashes Ledge East and Cashes Ledge West Area
Closures (blocks 128 and 130);
2. The requirement to use a minimum of 6-inch (15.2-cm) spacing
between the fairlead rollers of de-hooking gear (``crucifiers''); and
3. The 22-inch (55.9-cm) minimum fish size limit for cod that may
be lawfully sold (the minimum size limit for cod that may be lawfully
sold is decreased to 19 inches (28.3 cm), consistent with the
regulations that were in place prior to the Court's Remedial Order).
Classification
This rulemaking is required to be made effective by June 1, 2002,
by the May 23, 2002, Order issued by the Court in Conservation Law
Foundation, et al., v. Evans, Case No. 00CV01134 (D.D.C., Dec. 28,
2001). This Order leaves NMFS with no discretion as to whether or when
to promulgate this interim final rule.
This rule has been determined to be significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866. NMFS has not prepared an assessment of the
potential costs and benefits of this rule as required by the Executive
Order. However, in the April 29, 2002, interim final rule, which
implemented the short-term measures contained in the Settlement
Agreement, NMFS conducted an assessment of the potential costs and
benefits of the measures contained in that rule. Accordingly, the
analyses contained in the April 29, 2002, interim final rule continue
to be pertinent as NMFS is implementing the management measures
contained in the Settlement Agreement. This interim final rule will
relieve restrictions on the fishing industry.
Because the Court mandated on May 23, 2002, that this rule must be
made effective by June 1, 2002, it is impracticable for NMFS to provide
prior notice and an opportunity for public comment. Such procedures
would prevent NMFS from timely implementation of the Court's order.
Accordingly, the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (AA) finds that
there exists good cause to waive the notice and comment requirements of
the Administrative Procedure Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The AA
is also waiving the 30 day delay in effective date under 5
U.S.C.(d)(1), as this rule relieves a restriction on the fishing
industry.
Since notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required
for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, this rule is not
subject to the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. As such, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required for this
rulemaking, and none has been prepared. 5 U.S.C. 603.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 31, 2002.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended
as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Sec. 648.14 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 648.14, paragraphs (a)(149) through (151) are removed.
Sec. 648.80 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 648.80, paragraph (n)(6) is removed.
4. In Sec. 648.81, the heading of paragraph (u) and paragraph
(u)(1) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.81 Closed areas.
* * * * *
(u) Cashes Ledge Closure Area. (1) No fishing vessel or person on a
fishing vessel may enter, fish in, or be in, and no fishing gear
capable of catching NE multispecies, unless otherwise allowed in this
part, may be in, or on board a vessel in, the area known as the Cashes
Ledge Closure Area, as defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated, except as specified in paragraphs
(s) and (u)(2) of this section:
CASHES LEDGE CLOSURE AREA\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. Lat. W. Long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL1 43 deg.07' 69 deg.02'
CL2 42 deg.49.5 68 deg.46'
'
CL3 42 deg.46.5 68 deg.50.5
' '
CL4 42 deg.43.5 68 deg.58.5
' '
CL5 42 deg.42.5 69 deg.17.5
' '
CL6 42 deg.49.5 69 deg.26'
'
CL1 43 deg.07' 69 deg.02'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\A chart depicting this area is available from the Regional
Administrator upon request (see Table 1 to Sec. 600.502 of this
chapter).
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 648.83, paragraph (a)(3) is revised to read as follows
(paragraph (a)(3) expires on July 31, 2002):
Sec. 648.83 Multispecies minimum fish sizes.
(a) * * *
(3) Minimum fish sizes for recreational vessels and charter/party
vessels that are not fishing under a NE multispecies DAS are specified
in Sec. 648.89. Except as provided in Sec. 648.17, all other vessels
are subject to the following minimum fish sizes, determined by total
length (TL):
MINIMUM FISH SIZES (TL) FOR COMMERCIAL VESSELS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Sizes (inches)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cod 19 (48.3 cm)
Haddock 19 (48.3 cm)
Pollock 19 (48.3 cm)
Witch flounder (gray sole) 14 (35.6 cm)
Yellowtail flounder 13 (33.0 cm)
American plaice (dab) 14 (35.6 cm)
Atlantic halibut 36 (91.4 cm)
Winter flounder (blackback) 12 (30.5 cm)
Redfish 9 (22.9 cm)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 02-14050 Filed 5-31-02; 2:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ June
/ Wednesday, June 05, 2002
Credit Cards - Arizona Pools - Loans - Guitar Books
|
|