Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ July
/ Monday, July 01, 2002
[Federal Register: July 1, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 44167-44168]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jy02-38]
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
[[Page 44167]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Judith Restoration EIS--Lewis and Clark National Forest
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement on a proposal to treat dry forest types, whitebark pine,
limber pine and aspen, the need to reduce fuels near the urban
interface, the need to improve water quality combined with the timing
of a State facilitated sub-basin review, and opportunities for
westslope cutthroat trout habitat enhancement. The analysis area
encompasses approximately 214,000 acres of the Judith Ranger District,
Lewis and Clark National Forest, Judith Basin County, Montana.
DATES: It is anticipated that the draft EIS will be released for review
and comment in the winter 2002/2003.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Betty Holder, Judith District
Ranger, Lewis and Clark National Forest, Box 484, Stanford, MT 59479.
Electronic mail may be sent to comment/rl--lewisclark@fs.fed.us
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Johnsten, EIS Co-team Leader,
(406) 791-7700 or Betty Holder, EIS Co-team Leader (406) 566-2292.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Service proposes vegetation
treatment and road and trail closures/modifications on the Judith
Ranger District within the Little Belt Mountains, which includes the
Middle Fork and South Fork of the Judith River. A preliminary
assessment determined this area to have a high percentage of dry forest
types, such as Douglas-fir, which are currently overstocked, largely
due to fire suppression. This has also led to high fuel loading, which
is problematic near private inholdings and urban interfaces. In
addition, water quality in the South Fork and tributaries has been
affected by past management actions. Several populations of genetically
pure westslope cutthroat trout are found in the South Fork. Improved
habitat for these species is key to their survival. The enclosed map
shows where, within the analysis area, there are opportunities to take
action to address these objectives and meet the goals outlined below.
This EIS will review six alternatives.
Decisions To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide whether and where vegetative
treatment and road/trail activities would take place in the project
area. He will decide the number of acres and miles of road/trail, if
any, on which activity would take place and the types of treatment
methods to be used. He will decide when any management activities would
take place, what mitigation measures would be implemented to address
concerns, and whether the action requires amendment(s) to the Lewis and
Clark Forest Plan.
Responsible Official
Rick Prausa, Forest Supervisor, is the Responsible Official for
making the decision to implement any of the alternatives evaluated. He
will document his decision and rationale in a Record of Decision.
Preliminary Issues
Issues associated with this analysis that have been submitted from
initial scoping efforts include impacts of proposed activities on
wildlife and fish species and their habitat, soil resources, Wilderness
Study Area, Inventoried Roadless Areas, water quality and water yield,
and forest health.
Public Involvement, Rationale, and Public Meetings
Initial scoping for this project began in April 2001. A letter was
sent to 120 individuals requesting comment on the proposed action. A
45-day review period for comments on the Draft EIS will be provided.
Comments received will be considered and included in documentation of
the Final EIS. The public is encouraged to take part in the process and
to visit with Forest Service officials at any time during the analysis
and prior to the decision. The Forest Service has sought and will
continue to seek information, comments and assistance from Federal,
State and local agencies and other individuals or organizations who may
be interested in, or affected by, the proposed action.
Electronic Access and Filing Addresses
Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to mailroom--r1--
lewis-- and-- clark@fs. fed.us. Please reference the Judith Restoration
EIS on the subject line. Also, include your name and mailing address
with your comments so documents pertaining to this project may be
mailed to you.
Estimated Dates for Filing
The Draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for public review by
winter, 2002/2003. At that time EPA will publish a Notice of
Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment
period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA publishes
the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. It is very
important that those interested in the management of this area
participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed by July, 2003. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments
received during the comment period that pertain to the environmental
consequences of the action, as well as those pertaining to applicable
laws, regulations, and policies. These will be considered in making a
decision regarding the proposal.
The Reviewers Obligation To Comment
The Forest Service believes it is important to give reviewers
notice at this early stage of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be
[[Page 44168]]
waived or dismissed by the courts. Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris,
490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Dated: June 24, 2002.
Lynn Johnson,
Acting Lewis and Clark Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 02-16420 Filed 6-28-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ July
/ Monday, July 01, 2002
Bankruptcy - Debt Consolidation - Credit Card Consolidation - Loans
|
|