Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ July
/ Tuesday, July 23, 2002
[Federal Register: July 23, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 141)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 48073-48078]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23jy02-689]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 160
[USCG-2001-10689]
RIN 2115-AG47
Temporary Requirements for Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; change of effective period of
temporary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to extend to March 31, 2003, the
effective period for the temporary rule on notification of arrival
requirements. Extension of the effective period would ensure sufficient
time to complete the rulemaking. Continuing the temporary rule in
effect while the permanent rulemaking is in progress will help to
ensure the security of our ports and the uninterrupted flow of maritime
commerce during that period.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before August 22, 2002. Comments sent to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) on collection of information must reach OMB
on or before August 22, 2002.
ADDRESSES: To make sure that your comments and related material are not
entered more than once in the docket, please submit them by only one of
the following means:
(1) By mail to the Docket Management Facility (USCG-2001-10689),
U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(2) By delivery to room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
(3) By fax to the Docket Management Facility at 202-493-2251.
(4) Electronically through the Web site for the Docket Management
System at http://dms.dot.gov/.
You must also mail comments on collection of information to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, ATTN: Desk Officer,
U.S. Coast Guard.
The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as
[[Page 48074]]
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or
copying at room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket
on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call LTJG Marcus A. Lines, U.S. Coast Guard (G-MMP), at 202-267-6854.
If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
call Dorothy Beard, Chief, Dockets, Department of Transportation, at
202-366-5149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking. This proposed
rule would extend the effective period of the temporary final rule
entitled ``Temporary Requirements for Notification of Arrival in U.S.
Ports'' that was published in the Federal Register on October 4, 2001
(66 FR 50565) and amended on November, 19, 2001 (66 FR 57877), on
January 18, 2002 (67 FR 2571), and on May 30, 2002 (67 FR 3782).
Comments and related materials addressing the extension of the
effective period of the temporary rule should include your name and
address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-2001-
10689), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You may submit
your comments and material by mail, hand delivery, fax, or electronic
means to the Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES;
please submit your comments and material by only one means. If you
submit them by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format,
no larger than 81/2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. We will consider all comments and materials received
during the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of
them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Regulatory History
On October 4, 2001, we published a temporary final rule entitled
``Temporary Requirements for Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports'' in
the Federal Register (66 FR 50565). Subsequently, we published two
corrections in the Federal Register [November 19, 2001 (66 FR 57877)]
and [January 18, 2002 (67 FR 2571)]. On May 30, 2002, we extended the
effective period of the temporary rule through September 30, 2002 (67
FR 37682).
Background and Purpose
We published a related notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to make
permanent changes to the notice of arrival requirements [''Notification
of Arrival in U.S. Ports'' June 19, 2002 (67 FR 41659)]. We expected
the extension of the temporary rule through September 30, 2002, would
have provided us enough time to complete the permanent changes to the
notice of arrival requirements. Now, however, we propose to further
extend the effective period of the temporary rule until March 31, 2003,
to ensure sufficient time to complete the changes. Continuing the
temporary rule in effect while the permanent rulemaking is in progress
will help to ensure the security of our ports and the uninterrupted
flow of maritime commerce during that period.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposal is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. It has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget under that Order. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Transportation (DOT)[February 26, l979 (44 FR 11040)].
As discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard has temporarily
changed the notice of arrival (NOA) regulations and proposes to extend
the effective period of those requirements until March 31, 2003. When
assessing the impact of the temporary requirements, we estimated that
providing the Coast Guard with the additional information about
passengers, crew, and cargo will impose minimal burden on vessels
already complying with the notification requirements of 33 CFR part
160, subpart C. As explained below, the total cost to extend the
effective period of the temporary rule should not exceed $377,324:
Cost and Burden. Coast Guard data on Notification of Arrival
information for 1998 and 1999 were used to estimate the maximum
populations that would be affected by this proposal. Table 1
categorizes the affected vessel population into four sub-populations.
They are:
``Non-AMVER/Non-Great Lakes Vessels''--vessels already
required to comply with NOA regulations;
``AMVER''--vessels complying with the Automated Mutual
Assistance Vessel Rescue system and that were exempt from NOA
requirements prior to the temporary rule;
``Great Lakes Vessels''--vessels greater than 300 gross
tons, on Great Lakes routes, that were exempt from NOA requirements
prior to the temporary rule; and
``Vessels on Scheduled Routes''--vessels operating upon a
route that is described in a schedule that is submitted to the Captain
of the Port for each port or place of destination listed in the
schedule. The table also sets out the number of vessels and their total
number of U.S. port calls (arrivals) for each vessel sub-population.
Table 1.--Number of Vessels and U.S. Port Calls for 1998 and 1999*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly
1998 1999 Annual average average
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-AMVER/Non-Great Lakes Vessels............... 9,795 9,538 9,667 NA
U.S. Port Calls............................. 63,090 63,482 63,286 5,274
AMVER Vessels................................... 625 609 617 NA
U.S. Port Calls............................. 4,027 4,052 4,040 337
Great Lakes Vessels............................. 83 82 83 NA
U.S. Port Calls............................. 840 786 813 68
---------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 48075]]
Totals Vessels.......................... 10,503 10,229 10,367 NA
U.S. Port Calls......................... 67,957 68,320 68,139 5,679
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* These estimates include vessels on scheduled routes that will experience about the same costs as the other
vessels in this population.
Vessels less than 300 gross tons making ports of call in the
Seventh Coast Guard District have to file NOA reports with the COTP.
This proposal would maintain the requirement, and the estimate of the
vessels and port calls presented in Table 1 accounted for this special
group.
Before the temporary final rule, vessels had to file multiple NOA
reports if they were visiting multiple U.S. ports on the same voyage.
Under the temporary rule, vessels making calls to multiple U.S. ports
do not have to file multiple NOA reports; rather, the temporary rule
allows a single report listing all destinations in the United States
along with estimated arrival dates for each port. The Coast Guard did
not collect or maintain information on the number of vessels that made
multiple U.S. port calls under separate NOA reports to estimate the
number of consolidated reports under the temporary rule. The totals
above, therefore, represent a conservative estimate, a ``worst-case
scenario,'' of the numbers of vessels and NOA reports that would be
affected by this proposal.
Finally, vessels that make scheduled trips outside of their COTP
zones would no longer be exempt from reporting requirements. We do not
know how many of these vessels and port calls exist, though we know
they are included in the population of non-AMVER/non-Great Lakes
vessels. For the purposes of analysis, these vessels and port calls are
included in the non-AMVER/non-Great Lakes population.
Cost of the Temporary Rule
Minimal burden would be imposed on vessels whose applicability to
the NOA reporting requirements was upheld by the temporary rule. The
cargo, crew, and passenger information these vessels provide to the
Coast Guard is already collected on a form submitted to the Immigration
and Naturalization Services (INS) (INS form I-418). We assumed 10
minutes (0.167 hours) would be spent retrieving and transmitting the
cargo, crew, and passenger information. We assumed that there would be
a $2 transmittal fee (fax, email, telephone, etc.) to provide this
information to the Coast Guard. We assumed that clerical labor would
complete these tasks at a cost of $31.00 per hour (loaded labor rate,
2001). Based on 1998 and 1999 data, we estimated 31,644 port calls
would be made over this extension period (6 months-until March 31,
2003). The summary of unit costs and total rulemaking costs for non-
AMVER/non-Great Lakes vessels is presented in Table 2.
Table 2.--Total Rulemaking Costs for Non-AMVER/Non-Great Lakes Vessels
[October 2002-March 2003] *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Labor hours Labor hours Cost per labor Cost per rulemaking
Port calls during temporary rule per port call during hour information cost for these
temporary rule transmittal vessels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31,644.......................... 0.167 5,274 $31.00 $2.00 $226,782
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detail may not calculate to total due to independent rounding.
* These estimates include vessels on scheduled routes that will experience about the same costs as the other
vessels in this population.
Vessels that were exempt from NOA requirements before the original
effective period of the temporary rule would, as a result of this
proposal, continue to provide the Coast Guard with NOA reports in
addition to providing the cargo, crew, and passenger information until
March 31, 2003. These vessels (AMVER and vessels that transit only the
Great Lakes) would incur cost by extending the effective period of the
temporary rule that requires them to submit an NOA report. Based on the
OMB-approved Collection of Information for NOA (OMB-2115-0557), we
estimated that it would take 10 minutes (0.167 hours) to complete the
report, plus an additional 5 minutes (0.083 hours) for the general
description of the cargo. We assumed that clerical labor would complete
the report at a cost of $31.00 per hour. Additionally, these vessels
would need to develop and submit the cargo, crew, and passenger
information. Based on information from the INS (OMB-1115-0083), it will
require 60 minutes (1.000 hour) to complete both lists, for a total of
75 minutes (1.250 hours) for the entire submission (NOA report, cargo
description, crew and passenger information). There would be a $2
transmittal fee to provide the information to the Coast Guard. Based on
1998 and 1999 data, we estimated that 2,427 port calls would be made
over the time period of this rulemaking. The summary of unit costs and
total rulemaking costs for AMVER/Great Lakes vessels is presented in
Table 3.
[[Page 48076]]
Table 3.--Total Rulemaking Costs for AMVER/Great Lakes Vessels
[October 2002-March 2003]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Labor hours Labor hours Cost per labor Cost per rulemaking
Port calls during temporary rule per port call during hour information cost for these
temporary rule transmittal vessels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,427........................... 1.250 3,033 $31.00 $2.00 $98,870
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detail may not calculate to total due to independent rounding.
Finally, all vessels affected would continue to communicate with
the National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC) upon departure from a U.S.
port when their next port of call is also a U.S. port. Vessels are to
phone or fax the date of departure to the NVMC along with the name of
the port just departed. The NVMC will transmit this information to the
COTP in the next port of call. We assumed that reporting this would
require 1 minute (0.017 hours) per departure and that clerical labor
($31.00 per hour) would make the call or send the fax. We assumed the
transmittal fee would be $1.00 per call/fax. There will be an estimated
34,071 departures over the 6-month extension period of the temporary
rule (until March 31, 2003). The cost and burden for notifying NVMC of
the date of departure and last port of call is presented in Table 4.
Table 4.--Total Rulemaking Costs for Providing NVMC with Date of Departure and Last Port of Call Information
[October 2002-March 2003]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Port departures during temporary Labor hours Labor hours Cost per labor Cost per rulemaking
rule per port call during hour information cost for these
temporary rule transmittal vessels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
34,071.......................... 0.017 568 $31.00 $1.00 $51,672
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detail may not calculate to total due to independent rounding.
The total cost and burden of the rule is presented in Table 5.
Table 5.--Total Rulemaking Cost for All Affected Vessels
[October 2002-March 2003]*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden per
Arrivals/ Cost per arrival/ Total Total
departures arrival/ departure rulemaking rulemaking
departure (hours) cost burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arr. Non-AMVER/Non-Great Lakes.. 31,644 $7.17 0.167 $226,782 5,274
Arr. AMVER/Great Lakes.......... 2,427 40.75 1.250 98,870 3,033
Dep. all vessels................ 34,071 1.52 0.017 51,672 568
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals...................... 68,142 .............. .............. $377,324 8,875
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detail may not calculate to total due to independent rounding.
* These estimates include vessels on scheduled routes that will experience about the same costs as the other
vessels in this population.
Need for the Temporary Rule
This proposal would ensure the timely receipt of advance
information about vessels, cargo, and people entering U.S. ports and
would help minimize disruption to commerce. The additional information
required by this proposal would increase security and provide
protection for the nation's ports and waterways. There would be some
savings from the consolidated NOA submission for two or more
consecutive arrivals at U.S. ports.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposal would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposal
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. If you think that your business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this
proposal will have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a
comment to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES. In your comment, explain why you think it qualifies and how
and to what degree this proposal would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business
[[Page 48077]]
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If
you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-
888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This proposal would extend the effective period of an existing
collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3520). As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of
information'' comprises reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring, posting,
labeling, and other, similar actions. The title and description of the
information collection, a description of those who would be required to
collect the information, and an estimate of the total annual burden
follow. The estimate covers the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing sources of data, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection.
Title: Advance Notice of Vessel Arrival and Departure.
OMB Control Number: 2115-0557.
Summary of the Collection of Information: The Coast Guard requires
pre-arrival messages from any vessel entering a port or place in the
United States. This proposal would extend the effective period of the
temporary notice of arrival requirements to March 31, 2003.
Need for Information: To ensure port safety and security and to
ensure the uninterrupted flow of commerce, the Coast Guard proposes to
extend the effective period of the temporary notice of arrival
requirements.
Proposed Use of Information: Extending the NOA information reported
would enable the control of vessel traffic, the development of
contingency plans, and the enforcement of regulations.
Description of the Respondents: The respondents are owners, agents,
masters, operators, or persons in charge of vessels bound for or
departing from U.S. ports.
Number of Respondents: The existing OMB-approved collection number
of respondents is 10,367. Extending the temporary rule would not
increase the total number of respondents.
Frequency of Response: The existing OMB-approved collection annual
number of responses is 136,278. Extending the temporary rule would not
increase the total number of responses.
Burden of Response: The existing OMB-approved collection burden of
response is 15 minutes (0.250 hours). Extending the temporary rule
would not increase the burden.
Estimate of Total Annual Burden: The existing OMB-approved
collection total annual burden is 39,037 hours. Extending the temporary
rule would not increase the total annual burden.
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), we submitted a copy of this proposal to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for its review of the collection of
information. Due to the circumstances surrounding this temporary rule,
we asked for ``emergency processing'' of our request. We received OMB
approval for the collection of information on September 26, 2001. It is
valid until September 30, 2002, and we are requesting it be extended
until March 31, 2003.
We ask for public comment on the collection of information to help
us determine how useful the information is; whether it can help us
perform our functions better; whether it is readily available
elsewhere; how accurate our estimate of the burden of collection is;
how valid our methods for determining burden are; how we can improve
the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information; and how we can
minimize the burden of collection.
If you submit comments on the collection of information, submit
them both to OMB and to the Docket Management Facility where indicated
under ADDRESSES, by the date under DATES.
You need not respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control number from OMB.
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, the effects of this rule are discussed elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
may disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
To help the Coast Guard establish regular and meaningful
consultation and collaboration with Indian and Alaskan Native tribes,
we published a notice in the Federal Register (66 FR 36361, July 11,
2001) requesting comments on how to best carry out the Order. We invite
your comments on how this rule might impact tribal governments, even if
that impact may not constitute a ``tribal implication'' under the
Order.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the
[[Page 48078]]
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have considered the environmental impact of this proposed rule
and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(a), of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD, this rule is categorically excluded from further
environmental documentation. This proposed rule would extend the
effective period of the changes to the requirements established in the
notification of arrival regulations. They are procedural in nature and
therefore are categorically excluded. A ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 160
Administrative practice and procedure; Harbors; Hazardous materials
transportation; Marine safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Vessels; Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 160 as follows:
PART 160--PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY--GENERAL
Subpart C--Notifications of Arrival, Departures, Hazardous
Conditions, and Certain Dangerous Cargoes
1. The authority citation for part 160 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1226, 1231; 49 CFR 1.46.
Sec. 160.201 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 160.201, paragraphs (c) and (d), which were suspended at
66 FR 50565, October 4, 2001, from October 4, 2001, until June 15,
2002, and further suspended at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until
September 30, 2002, will continue to be suspended through March 31,
2003; and paragraphs (e) and (f), added at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, effective October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, extended in
effect at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, and
paragraph (g), added at 66 FR 50565, October 4, 2001, effective October
4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, amended by 66 FR 57877, November 19,
2001, extended in effect at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September
30, 2002, are extended in effect through March 31, 2003.
Sec. 160.203 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 160.203, the definition of ``certain dangerous cargo,''
which was suspended at 66 FR 50565, October 4, 2001, from October 4,
2001, until June 15, 2002, and further suspended at 67 FR 37682, May
30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, will continue to be suspended
through March 31, 2003; and the definitions for ``certain dangerous
cargo'', ``crewmember'', ``nationality'', and ``persons in addition to
crewmembers'' which were added at 66 FR 50565, October 4, 2001,
effective October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, extended in effect at
67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, are extended in
effect through March 31, 2003.
Sec. 160.T204 [Amended]
4. Section 160.T204, which was added at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, effective October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, extended in
effect at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, is
extended in effect though March 31, 2003.
Sec. 160.207 [Amended]
5. Section 160.207, which was suspended at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, from October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, and further suspended
at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, will continue
to be suspended through March 31, 2003.
Sec. 160.T208 [Amended]
6. Section 160.T208, which was added at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, effective October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, and amended by 66
FR 57877, November 19, 2001, and by 67 FR 2571, January 18, 2002, and
extended in effect at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September 30,
2002, is extended in effect though March 31, 2003.
Sec. 160.211 [Amended]
7. Section 160.211, which was suspended at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, from October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, and further suspended
at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, will continue
to be suspended through March 31, 2003.
Sec. 160.T212 [Amended]
8. Section 160.T212, which was added at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, effective October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, amended by 66 FR
57877, November 19, 2001, and extended in effect at 67 FR 37682, May
30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, is extended in effect though March
31, 2003.
Sec. 160.213 [Amended]
9. Section 160.213, which was suspended at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, from October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, and further suspended
at 67 FR 37682, May 30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, will continue
to be suspended through March 31, 2003.
Sec. 160.T214 [Amended]
10. Section 160.T214, which was added at 66 FR 50565, October 4,
2001, effective October 4, 2001, until June 15, 2002, amended by 66 FR
57877, November 19, 2001, and extended in effect at 67 FR 37682, May
30, 2002, until September 30, 2002, is extended in effect though March
31, 2003.
Dated: July 18, 2002.
Joseph J. Angelo,
Acting Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security, and
Environmental Protection.
[FR Doc. 02-18596 Filed 7-18-02; 3:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Browse by Year
/ 2002
/ July
/ Tuesday, July 23, 2002
Loans - Debt Consolidation - Phoenix Pools - Credit Cards
|
|
