Browse by Year
/ 2003
/ October
/ Friday, October 03, 2003
[Federal Register: October 3, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 192)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57366-57368]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03oc03-17]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP San Diego 03-030]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary safety zones, a
stationary safety zone and a moving safety zone, on the navigable
waters of San Diego Bay in support of the Fleet Week Sea and Air
Parade. These temporary safety zones are necessary to provide for the
safety of the crews, spectators, participants of the event,
participating vessels and other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within these safety zones unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11:30 a.m. (PDT) on October 4, 2003,
to 3 p.m. (PDT) on October 4, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket [COTP San Diego 03-030] and are available
for inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard, Marine Safety Office San
Diego, 2716 North Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101-1064, between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Petty Officer Austin Murai, USCG, c/o
U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port, telephone (619) 683-6495.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. In keeping with the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also finds that
good cause exists for making this regulation effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. The precise location of
the event necessitating promulgation of this safety zone and other
logistical details surrounding the event were not finalized until a
date fewer than 30 days prior to the event. Delaying the effective date
of this rule would be contrary to the public interest because doing
such would prevent the Coast Guard from maintaining the safety of the
participants of the event and users of the waterway.
Background and Purpose
The San Diego Fleet Week Foundation is sponsoring the 2003 Fleet
Week Sea and Air Parade. The Sea and Air Parade is a classic naval
review consisting of Navy vessels of various classes, some of which are
restricted in their maneuverability. The naval review will transit
through San Diego Bay. These temporary safety zones are necessary to
provide for the safety of the crews, spectators, and participants of
the Fleet Week Sea and Air Parade and are also necessary to protect
other vessels and users of the waterway.
Discussion of Rule
This rule creates a stationary safety zone and a moving safety
zone. The limits of the stationary safety zone will extend south from
the southern shoreline on Harbor Island to the southern most limits of
the navigational channel. On the west side the boundary will be a line
of longitude equal to 117-12-48 W and on the east side the boundary
will be a line of longitude equal to 117-12-00 W.
The limits of the moving safety zone are as follows: 1000 yards
forward, 200 yards on either side, and 700 yards behind the Fleet Week
parade participants while transiting through San Diego Bay.
The two safety zones will be enforced from 11:30 a.m. (PDT) to 3
p.m. (PDT) on October 4, 2003. These safety zones are necessary to
provide for the safety of the crews, spectators, and participants of
the Fleet Week Sea and Air Parade and to protect other vessels and
users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within these safety
zones unless authorized by the U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander, or
his designated representative from Activities San Diego.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be
minimal because of its limited duration of three and a half (3\1/2\)
hours and the limited geographic scope of the safety zones.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 57367]]
The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the portion of San Diego Bay south of Harbor
Island. However, these safety zones will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because these
zones are limited in scope and duration. In addition, the Coast Guard
will publish local notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue broadcast
notice to mariners (BNM) alerts via VHF-FM marine channel 16 before the
safety zone is enforced.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If your
small business or organization is affected by this rule and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact Lieutenant Commander Rick Sorrell, U.S. Coast Guard Marine
Safety Office San Diego at (619) 683-6495.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because we are creating a safety zone.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add a new Sec. 165.T11-048 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-048 Safety Zone; San Diego Bay, CA.
(a) Location. The following areas are safety zones:
(1) Stationary safety zone. The limits of the stationary safety
zone extend from the shoreline on Harbor Island South to the southern
most limits of the navigational channel. On the west side the boundary
is a line of longitude 117[deg]12'48'' W and on the east side the
boundary is a line of longitude 117[deg]12'00'' W.
(2) Moving safety zone. The limits of the moving safety zone are as
follows:
[[Page 57368]]
1000 yards forward, 200 yards on either side, and 700 yards behind the
Fleet Week parade participants transiting through San Diego Bay.
(b) Effective period. These safety zones will be in effect from
11:30 a.m. (PDT) until 3 p.m. (PDT) on October 4, 2003. If the event
concludes prior tothe scheduled termination time, the Captain of the
Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. (1) ''Official Patrol Vessels'' consist of any
Coast Guard, other Federal, state or local law enforcement, and any
public or sponsor-provided vessels assigned or approved by the Captain
of the Port San Diego, to patrol this event.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within these
safety zones is prohibited, unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, or his designated representative such as a Patrol Commander.
Mariners requesting permission to transit through a safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the Captain of the Port, Patrol
Commander, or other designated representative from Activities San
Diego, who may be contacted via VHF-FM Channel 16.
(3) Each person in a safety zone who receives notice of a lawful
order or direction issued by an official patrol vessel shall obey the
order or direction.
(4) The Patrol Commander is empowered to prohibit entry into and
control the movement of all vessels in the regulated area. The Patrol
Commander shall be designated by the Captain of the Port San Diego;
will be a U.S. Coast Guard commissioned officer, warrant officer or
petty officer to act as the Captain of the Port's official
representative; and will be located aboard the lead official patrol
vessel.
(5) The Patrol Commander may, upon request, allow the transit of
vessels through the safety zones when it is safe to do so.
Dated: September 24, 2003.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Diego.
[FR Doc. 03-25045 Filed 10-2-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Browse by Year
/ 2003
/ October
/ Friday, October 03, 2003
Arizona Landscaping - Internet Marketing - Loans - Credit Cards
|
|