[Federal Register: December 11, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 238)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 69025-69029]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11de03-7]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IN159-1a; FRL-7598-6]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Indiana; Oxides of Nitrogen Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the oxides of nitrogen 
(NOX) budget trading program submitted by Indiana on June 
26, 2003, and August 4, 2003. These changes revise Indiana's 
NOX State Implementation Plan (SIP) and NOX 
budget approved by EPA on November 8, 2001. The most significant change 
adds 17 units from three sources to the NOX trading portion 
of the Indiana plan. The plan revision also includes: A compliance date 
change to accommodate revised deadlines under the NOX SIP 
call; a revised definition of ``energy efficiency project'' to include 
anaerobic digestion systems; the addition of formulas to describe an 
energy efficiency and renewable energy ``set aside''; and minor wording 
changes and correction of typographical errors. These changes are 
consistent with Indiana's previously approved ``Phase I budget.''

DATES: This rule is effective on January 26, 2004, unless EPA receives 
relevant adverse written comments by January 12, 2004. If adverse 
comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule 
in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not 
take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, bortzer.jay@epa.gov. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier, please 
follow the detailed instructions described in subsection (B)(1)(i) 
through (iii) of the Supplementary Information section.
    You may obtain a copy of the submittal and plan revisions at the 
above address. Please telephone John Paskevicz at (312) 886-6084 if you 
intend to visit the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria 
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Chicago, Illinois 60604. E-Mail Address: paskevicz.john@epa.gov.

[[Page 69026]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

    This supplementary Information section is organized as follows:

I. General Information
II. Background
III. Summary of the State Submittal
A. What sources are affected by this rule change?
B. What additional changes has Indiana made?
C. What public review opportunities did Indiana provide?
D. Do the changes continue to meet the NOX budget for 
Indiana?
IV. EPA Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Throughout this document, the term ``you'' refers to the reader of 
this rule and/or to sources subject to the State rule, and the terms 
``we'', ``us'', or ``our'' refer to EPA.

I. General Information

A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information 
?

    1. The Regional Office has established an official public 
rulemaking file available for inspection at the Regional Office. EPA 
has established an official public rulemaking file for this action 
under ``Region 5 Air Docket IN159''. The official public file consists 
of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public 
comments received, and other information related to this action. 
Although a part of the official docket, the public rulemaking file does 
not include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official 
public rulemaking file is the collection of materials that is available 
for public viewing at the Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation 
Division, EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 
60604. EPA requests that you contact the contact listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The 
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 
8:30 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays.
    2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document 
electronically through the regulations.gov Web site located at http://www.regulations.gov
 where you can find, review, and submit comments on 
Federal rules that have been published in the Federal Register and are 
open for comment.
    For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is 
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, 
will be made available for public review at the EPA Regional Office, as 
EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains 
copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing 
copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in 
the version of the comment that is placed in the official public 
rulemaking file. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted 
material, will be available at the Regional Office for public 
inspection.

B. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand 
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the 
appropriate rulemaking identification number by including the text 
``Public comment on Direct Final rulemaking Region 5 Air Docket IN159'' 
in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure 
that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. 
Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked 
``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
    1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as 
prescribed below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing 
address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body 
of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside 
of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying 
the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the 
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA 
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further 
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA 
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information 
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the 
comment that is placed in the official public docket. If EPA cannot 
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you 
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    i. E-mail. Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to bortzer.jay@epa.gov. Please include the text ``Public comment on 
proposed rulemaking Region 5 Air Docket IN159'' in the subject line. 
EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send 
an e-mail comment directly without going through Regulations.gov, EPA's 
e-mail system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail 
addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are 
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public 
docket.
    ii. Regulations.gov. Your use of Regulations.gov is an alternative 
method of submitting electronic comments to EPA. Go directly to 
Regulations.gov at http://www.regulations.gov, then click on the button 
``TO SEARCH FOR REGULATIONS CLICK HERE,'' and select Environmental 
Protection Agency as the Agency name to search on. The list of current 
EPA actions available for comment will be listed. Please follow the 
online instructions for submitting comments. The system is an 
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your 
identity, e-mail address, or other contact information unless you 
provide it in the body of your comment.
    iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM 
that you mail to the mailing address identified in Section 2, directly 
below. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect, 
Word or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any 
form of encryption.
    2. By Mail. Send your comments to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch, (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Please include the text ``Public comment on 
Direct Final Rulemaking Regional Air Docket IN159'' in the subject line 
on the first page of your comment.
    3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: J. Elmer 
Bortzer, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch, (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are 
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. 
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through 
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays.

C. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?

    Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI 
electronically to EPA. You may claim information that you submit to EPA 
as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as CBI (if you 
submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the 
specific information that is CBI). Information so marked will not be 
disclosed except in

[[Page 69027]]

accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes 
any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not 
contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion 
in the official public regional rulemaking file. If you submit the copy 
that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the 
disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information not 
marked as CBI will be included in the public file and available for 
public inspection. If you have any questions about CBI or the 
procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person identified in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

II. Background

    On November 8, 2001 (66 FR 56465), EPA approved an Indiana 
NOX SIP revision because it fulfilled the NOX SIP 
Call Phase I emission budget requirements. That plan addressed 
emissions from electric generating units, large industrial boilers, 
turbines and cement kilns, in order to achieve reductions and meet the 
NOX budget required by EPA's October 27, 1998, 
NOX SIP Call. (63 FR 57357). The regulations approved 
include 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 10-3, the NOX 
reduction program for specific categories, and 326 IAC 10-4, the 
NOX budget trading program.
    The amendment to the Indiana plan currently before EPA, also 
referred to by Indiana as the ``NOX fix-up rule,'' addresses 
additional matters, some of which occurred after State adoption of the 
rule. The revisions consist of: (1) Regulating Ispat Inland Steel's and 
U.S. Steel's blast furnace gas boilers in 326 IAC 10-4 instead of 326 
IAC 10-3; (2) correcting the omission of three boilers at Purdue 
University and specifying their allowance allocations in 326 IAC 10-4; 
(3) amending the definition of ``energy efficiency projects'' to 
include anaerobic digestion systems; (4) adding three new formulas to 
the energy efficiency renewable energy ``set-aside'' provisions; (5) 
changing compliance and other dates for all sources subject to the 
NOX trading program, as a result of a judicial decision; and 
(6) making minor wording changes and correcting typographical errors.

III. Summary of the State Submittal

A. What Sources Are Affected by This Rule Change?

    There are a number of sources affected by this rule change. Purdue 
University's heating plant consists of four boilers which provide steam 
and electricity to the school. Three of these boilers were originally 
classified as ``small boilers'' in the NOX SIP Call 
inventory and therefore, were not included the NOX rules. 
However, Indiana has determined that these boilers meet the applicable 
threshold for the NOX trading program (250 million BTU per 
hour). IDEM calculated and allocated allowances for the boilers and 
included these boilers in 326 IAC 10-4.
    When EPA approved Indiana's NOX SIP on November 8, 2001, 
we determined that the Indiana submittal met the Phase I NOX 
SIP Call budget requirement. The plan included Indiana's Phase I budget 
demonstration and supporting documentation including initial unit 
allocations and two new rules: 326 IAC 10-3 and 326 IAC 10-4. The final 
adopted rule included the regulation of blast furnace gas units under 
10-3 rather than 10-4. A total of 25 blast furnace gas boilers at 4 
facilities with a maximum design heat input of greater than 250 mmBtu/
hr were regulated in 326 IAC 10-3. Since all of the units have a low 
emission rate on a lb/mmBtu basis, IDEM did not include these units in 
the trading program and did not require further emission reductions. 
The State inventory notes all of these units use blast furnace gas, 
natural gas, and/or coke oven gas to make steam. The steam is needed to 
operate cold air blowers which provide air to stoves and subsequently 
to the blast furnaces.
    The Indiana submittal addressed here moves 14 units from 2 sources 
(Ispat Inland and U.S. Steel-Gary Works) from 10-3 to 10-4, making the 
14 units at these 2 sources part of the trading program, and makes 
additional allowances available in the trading budget. This approach 
however, continues to maintain the total overall NOX budget 
for the State as is demonstrated in the revised budget demonstration.
    EPA does not generally believe it is appropriate to regulate only a 
portion of a category of similar sources under a cap and trade program, 
unless conditions (such as those in the opt-in provisions of the model 
trading rule in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 96) are 
imposed in order to address the potential for shifting utilization out 
of the trading program. When only a portion of a group of similar 
sources is regulated, there is the potential for utilization to be 
redistributed from capped to non-capped units in the category in such a 
way that emissions are shifted from within the trading program, meaning 
allowances are freed up and total emissions increase. When emissions 
from all sources in a source category are regulated and accounted for 
in a cap and trade program, utilization shifts among sources do not 
increase total emissions. However, for the particular source category 
involved here, specifically blast furnace gas boilers in the iron and 
steel industry, there seems to be little or no ability to shift 
utilization among plants. The boilers are located in proximity to blast 
furnaces and burn the by-product gas from the furnaces, which are used 
in the iron making process. The iron making process is integral to the 
steel making process at an iron and steel plant. The four plants in 
Indiana are owned and operated by four separate companies. In order for 
utilization of the blast furnace gas boilers at one plant to be shifted 
to those at another plant, steel production would have to be shifted, 
which seems highly unlikely. Given the low energy content and economic 
value of blast furnace gas itself, it is also highly unlikely that such 
gas from one plant would be transported to be burned at another plant.
    Considering the relatively small emissions and the unlikelihood of 
utilization and emissions shifting, EPA in this unique case accepts 
Indiana's proposal to split this particular source category for the 
purposes of Indiana's NOX budget trading program. However, 
EPA intends, as part of its review in 2007 of the results of the 
NOX SIP call, to evaluate the impact (including the effect 
on total emissions) of allowing some, but not all, of the blast furnace 
gas boilers to participate in the NOX budget trading 
program.
    The State has demonstrated and we agree that the changes submitted 
by Indiana will continue to provide for the timely compliance with the 
State's NOX budget during the 2007 ozone season. The 2 
sources which remain in and are subject to the provisions of 326 IAC 
10-3 will not adversely affect the overall budget. We are approving the 
revision because it meets the requirements of Sec.  51.121(b)(1)(I). 
While the changes increase the trading budget, the overall Phase I 
budget for Indiana will continue to be met.
    These newly included units will make a very small impact on the 
Indiana overall NOX budget. The budget remains within the 
NOX budget approved on November 8, 2001, (66 FR 56465). 
Specifically, the November 2001 plan contained a budget of 233,633 tons 
of NOX during the 2007 ozone season. The current revision 
caps NOX emissions for the same period at 233,548, well 
within the previously approved budget.
    The rule also adds anaerobic digesters to the list of sources in 
326 IAC 10-4-

[[Page 69028]]

2 eligible for energy efficiency and renewable energy allowances. 
Anaerobic digesters are closed, air-tight systems that use bacteria to 
break down organic matter and produce gases through this natural 
decomposition. One of the gases produced is methane, a combustible gas 
which is used to power engines to produce electricity. The purpose of 
this revision is to expand the number of types of projects eligible for 
energy efficiency renewable energy ``set-asides.'' Indiana has the 
flexibility to add to this program projects which it believes will have 
a positive effect on energy efficiency and generation output, and EPA 
agrees with this addition.

B. What Additional Changes Has Indiana Made?

    IDEM has added three new formulas to the energy efficiency and 
renewable energy set aside provisions in 326 IAC 10-4-9(e). The reason 
for this revision is to make allowances available, during the ozone 
control period, to producers of electricity using systems which are 
highly efficient.
    In addition, the rule has revised dates for compliance, changed 
from May 1, 2003 to May 31, 2004 as a result of a court decision 
affecting the NOX SIP call, Appalachian Power Co. et al. v. 
EPA, F.3d (D.C. Cir 2001). Finally, IDEM has made minor wording changes 
and corrected typographical errors.

C. What Public Review Opportunities Did Indiana Provide?

    Public notices were published in November 2002 and April 2003 for 
the two Indiana Air Pollution Control Board hearings in December 2002 
and May 2003, respectively. At both of these hearings, Indiana provided 
the public and the affected sources with an opportunity to comment on 
the changes to the Indiana NOX rules. Indiana also provided 
copies of the record as part of the submittal of the Indiana 
NOX plan.

D. Do the Changes Continue To Meet the NOX Budget for 
Indiana?

    Indiana provided a revised budget demonstration which takes into 
account the changes to the rule including the addition of the Ispat 
Inland, U.S. Steel and Purdue boilers to the trading program. The 
budget revisions affect only the non-EGU source category, and show a 
net decrease in the overall Indiana NOX budget.
    The changes for the three sources affect the set-asides for new 
large units at 326 IAC 10-4-9(e)(1)(A)(ii) and at 326 IAC 10-4-
9(e)(1)(B) for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. The 
Indiana analysis also demonstrates a net change to the overall Phase I 
budget to be a negative 85 tons during the ozone season. This decrease 
is the result of including the Purdue boilers in the trading program 
and allocating NOX allowances based on a controlled 
emissions level. In EPA's November 8, 2001 approval of the 2007 Indiana 
NOX SIP, the budget was set at 233,633 tons. In this action, 
following the implementation of these rule changes, the Indiana revised 
NOX budget for the 2007 ozone season is 233,548 tons.

IV. EPA Action

    EPA is taking final action to approve revisions to the 
NOX SIP submitted by Indiana on June 25, 2003, and August 4, 
2003. These revisions: shift certain existing sources from the general 
NOX reduction rule to the NOX trading rule; add 
additional sources to the NOX trading rule; change the 
definition of energy efficiency projects to include anaerobic digestion 
systems; add three new formulas to the energy efficiency and renewable 
set aside provisions; change compliance dates in accordance with the 
2001 court decision; and make some minor wording and typographical 
changes and corrections. Indiana's NOX SIP continues to meet 
the Phase I budget for EPA's NOX SIP Call.
    In meeting this emissions budget, EPA believes the State will 
achieve reductions in emissions of NOX which will have a 
significant impact on ozone air quality in-state and downwind from 
sources in Indiana.
    In the event we receive meaningful written adverse comment, this 
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received 
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on a proposal 
published elsewhere in today's Federal Register.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.

Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use

    This action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that 
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state 
law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that 
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).

Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect on one or 
more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government 
and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action also does not have federalism implications because it 
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a 
federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the 
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air 
Act.

Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health 
Risks and Safety Risks

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.

National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    In reviewing SIP submissions, USEPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),

[[Page 69029]]

EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use 
VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for USEPA, when 
it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission 
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose an information collection burden under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.).

Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. USEPA will submit a report containing this rule and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2). This rule will be effective January 26, 2004.

Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 9, 2004. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 2, 2003.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title 40 of 
the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52-- [AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart P--Indiana

0
2. Section 52.770 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(163) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (163) On June 26, 2003, the Indiana Department of Environmental 
Management (IDEM) submitted revisions to 326 IAC 10-3 (NOX 
Reduction Program for Specific Source Categories) and 326 IAC 10-4 
(NOX Budget Trading Program) of the Indiana Administrative 
Code (IAC). Also, on August 4, 2003, IDEM submitted a letter containing 
the Legislative Service Agency Document 00-54(F) as published 
in the Indiana Register on August 1, 2003, 26 IR 3550, containing the 
legal and approving signatures. The revised rules change the Indiana 
Phase I NOX budget to 233,548 tons per ozone season for 
2007.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Indiana Pollution Control Board rules: 326 IAC 10-3-1 and 326 
IAC 10-4-1, 10-4-2, 10-4-9, 10-4-10, 10-4-13, 10-4-14 and 10-4-15. 
Adopted by the Indiana Pollution Control Board on May 7, 2003. Filed 
with the Secretary on July 7, 2003. Published at Indiana Register 
Volume 26, Number 11, August 1, 2003 (26 IR 3550). Effective August 6, 
2003.

[FR Doc. 03-30696 Filed 12-10-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P