Browse by Year
/ 2003
/ December
/ Monday, December 15, 2003
[Federal Register: December 15, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 240)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69607-69609]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15de03-9]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08-03-030]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Inner Harbor Navigation Canal,
New Orleans, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the regulation governing the
operation of the SR 46 (St. Claude Avenue) bridge, mile 0.5 (Gulf
Intracoastal Water Way (GIWW) mile 6.2 East of Harvey Lock), the SR 39
(Judge Seeber/Claiborne Avenue) bridge, mile 0.9 (GIWW mile 6.7 East of
Harvey Lock), and the Florida Avenue bridge, mile 1.7 (GIWW mile 7.5
East of Harvey Lock), across the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal in New
Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana. New traffic studies indicate that
rush hour vehicular traffic has increased congestion across all three
bridges. This rule increases the time that the bridges will be closed
to vessel traffic by 15 minutes in the morning and afternoon and begin
the afternoon closure one hour and 15 minutes earlier.
DATES: This rule is effective January 14, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD8-03-030 and are available for inspection or
copying at 501 Magazine Street, Room 1313, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130-3396 between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the public docket for this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kay Wade, Bridge Administration
Branch, 504-589-2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On August 18, 2003, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, New
Orleans, LA was published in the Federal Register (68 FR 49393). We
received no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard, at the request of a state representative and the
owner of two of the three bridges crossing the Inner Harbor Navigation
Canal in New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana, issued a Notice of
Proposed Rule Making in the Federal Register on August 18, 2003 to
change the times of the existing drawbridge operation regulation.
Currently, all three bridges remain closed to navigation and open to
vehicular traffic during the morning and afternoon commuter rush hours.
The SR 46 (St. Claude Avenue) bascule span highway bridge at mile 0.5,
the SR 39 (Judge Seeber/Claiborne Avenue) vertical lift span highway
bridge at mile 0.9, and the Florida Avenue bascule span highway and
railroad bridge at mile 1.7 are governed by 33 CFR 117.458, which
states that the draw of these three bridges shall open on signal;
except that, from 6:45 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and from 4:45 p.m. to 6:45
p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays, the draws need
not open for the passage of vessels. The draws shall open at any time
for a vessel in distress.
In an effort to reassess and accurately determine the needs of the
commuters who cross these three bridges in the morning and afternoon en
route to and from work in the Lower Ninth Ward area of New Orleans and
in St. Bernard Parish, the Port of New Orleans hired
[[Page 69608]]
Urban Systems to perform a new traffic study. The March 2003 traffic
study revealed the average peak periods for vehicular traffic crossing
the SR 46 (St. Claude Avenue) and the Florida Avenue bridges are from
6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 5:45 p.m. This marks a
shift from the peak traffic times currently reflected in the regulation
that was based on a traffic study completed in October 1999.
Traffic counts for the SR 39 (Judge Seeber/Claiborne Avenue) bridge
were not conducted. However, the Claiborne Avenue bridge is located in
close proximity to the other two bridges and is expected to exhibit
similar traffic patterns. The Claiborne Avenue bridge provides a
vertical clearance of 40 feet above Mean High Water in the closed to
navigation position and is therefore expected to have less impact on
vessel traffic than the other two bridges.
A review of the bridge tender logs revealed that adjusting the
marine traffic closures to coordinate with vehicular rush hour traffic
should not significantly impact the flow of marine traffic.
Allowing the bridges to remain closed to marine traffic during
times that coincide with the heaviest vehicular traffic counts would
help to relieve the morning and afternoon rush hour commuter traffic
congestion across the bridges while having minimal impact on vessel
traffic.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There were no comments received regarding the proposed change;
therefore, no changes to the proposal were made and no changes have
been incorporated into the Final Rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
This rule adds 15 minutes to the existing drawbridge operating
regulation and shifts the afternoon closure time up by one hour and 15
minutes. A review of the bridge logs for these three bridges indicates
that minimal requests to open the bridges during these periods have
been made in the past, and there is no indication that there will be a
future increase.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. No
requests for assistance were received pursuant to this rule change.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
[[Page 69609]]
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Paragraph (32)(e) excludes the
promulgation of operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges
from the environmental documentation requirements of NEPA. Since this
rule will alter the normal operating conditions of the drawbridges, it
falls within this exclusion. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check
List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of P.L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. In Sec. 117.458, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 117.458 Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, New Orleans.
(a) The draws of the SR 46 (St. Claude Avenue) bridge, mile 0.5
(GIWW mile 6.2 East of Harvey Lock), the SR 39 (Judge Seeber/Claiborne
Avenue) bridge, mile 0.9 (GIWW mile 6.7 East of Harvey Lock), and the
Florida Avenue bridge, mile 1.7 (GIWW mile 7.5 East of Harvey Lock),
shall open on signal; except that, from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and from
3:30 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays,
the draws need not open for the passage of vessels. The draws shall
open at any time for a vessel in distress.
* * * * *
Dated: December 5, 2003.
R.F. Duncan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 03-30905 Filed 12-12-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Browse by Year
/ 2003
/ December
/ Monday, December 15, 2003
Bankruptcy - Debt Consolidation - Credit Card Consolidation - Loans
|
|