Browse by Year
/ 2005
/ March
/ Monday, March 28, 2005
[Federal Register: March 28, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 58)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15587-15590]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28mr05-15]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 202
[Docket No. RM 2005-3]
Registration of Claims to Copyright, Group Registration of
Published Photographs
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is amending
its final regulations concerning group registration of published
photographs to limit to 750 the number of photographs that may be
identified on continuation sheets submitted with a single application
form and filing fee. The regulation continues to place no limit on the
number of photographs that may be included in a single group
registration when the applicant elects not to use continuation sheets
and instead identifies the date of publication for each photograph on
the deposited image and the applicant meets the other
[[Page 15588]]
regulatory requirements for group registration of published
photographs. The regulation also clarifies that the date of publication
for each photograph may be identified in a text file on the CD-ROM or
DVD that contains the photographic images or on a list that accompanies
the deposit and provides the publication date for each image.
DATES: Effective March 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David O. Carson, General Counsel, or
Charlotte Douglass, Principal Legal Advisor, P.O. Box 70400,
Washington, DC 20024-0400, Telephone (202) 707-8380. Telefax: (202)
707-8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The copyright law permits a claim to
copyright to be registered in the Copyright Office at any time during
the subsistence of the copyright, when an application form is
accompanied by the appropriate deposit of a copyrightable work and a
filing fee. 17 U.S.C. 408(a). Section 408(b) generally requires the
deposit of two complete copies or phonorecords of a published work, but
it authorizes the Register of Copyrights by regulation to reduce the
number deposited for particular classes. 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1). The
Register may also ameliorate the requirement for individual
registrations where a group of separately published related works is
sought to be registered together. Id. The legislative history of the
1976 Copyright Act offers ``a group of photographs by one
photographer'' as a possibly appropriate grouping. H.R. Rep. No. 1476,
94th Cong., 2d Sess. 154 (1976).
In 2001, after notice, public comment, and careful consideration,
the Office established a regulation permitting group registration of
published photographs. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9). 66 FR 37142 (July 17, 2001).
That rule permitted an unlimited number of photographs that were taken
by the same person and published within the same calendar year, and for
which the copyrights are owned by the same person or entity, to be
registered with one application and fee. An applicant may choose from
three options to register such a group: The applicant may either (1)
submit a group of photographs published within three months before
receipt in the Copyright Office and give the range of dates within that
period on the application for registration at space 3b; (2) submit a
group of photographs published within a calendar year, give the range
of dates within that period on the application for registration at
space 3b, and identify with each deposited image the date of its
publication; or (3) submit a group of photographs published within a
calendar year, give the range of dates within that period on the
application for registration at space 3b, and identify each photograph
on a continuation sheet noting thereon its date of publication.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The regulation encouraged applicants to use the latter
option because the registration certificate, of which the
continuation sheets are a part, serves as prima facie evidence of
the date of publication of a work when it is registered within five
years of first publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the rulemaking process for group registration of
photographs, the Office proposed a rule that would limit the number of
photographs that could be registered in a group to no more than 500. 65
FR 26162, 26166 (May 5, 2000). In response to the request for comments,
many depositors asserted that the number of photographs should not be
so limited. 66 FR 37143, 37145 (July 17, 2001). One commenter stated
that some photographers took more than 500 images in one or two days.
Another commenter noted that she produced thousands of images per
quarter. Id. In response, the Office issued a final rule that did not
limit the number of photographs that could be submitted with one group
photograph claim. The Office stated that:
In light of the comments from photographers observing that the
proposed 500-photo limit is too low, the Office has reexamined its
reasons for proposing such a limit. The Office has concluded that
the administrative burdens of processing a group registration of a
large number of photos in excess of 500 would be acceptable.
Therefore, the final rule contains no limitation on the number of
photographs that may be included in a group.
66 FR 37148.
On the basis of this assumed technical capability of the Office
system to handle a large number of photos, the Office did not
contemplate that it would receive continuation sheets listing nearly
15,000 photographs, nor did it contemplate that the production of such
certificates would be as disruptive as it has been to Office
operations. Recent experience with the end-stage processing of
continuation sheets of a group of photographs that include more than
750 photographs listed on more than 50 continuation sheets has proved
administratively burdensome. Whatever the technical capability of
Office equipment might be to produce certificates with an unlimited
number of continuation sheets, the practical reality of doing so
requires an excessive amount of staff, time, equipment, and materials.
As a consequence, the cost effectiveness of making these group
registrations, at the current filing fee of $30.00 per group, is
seriously out of balance.
To relate recent empirical evidence, one recent claim consisted of
a staggering total of 1,776 continuation sheets. The Office required
three hours for initial processing of the claim, including stamping,
examining, labeling, scanning and packaging the claim for imaging. The
next step to process the claim, producing the image for the
registration record, required four and one-half hours to complete and
used 1777 registration number bar code labels. To print the 1777 page
certificate took an additional one and one-half hours during which no
other printing could be accomplished on that equipment. Then, the
certificate had to be packaged and mailed, at an inordinate expenditure
of three and one-half reams of certificate paper, postage and packaging
costs. Altogether, at the end stage of the registration process, this
single registration required more than 12 hours to complete. Making
matters worse, the Office currently has on hand 15 additional claims of
this kind, at various stages in registration processing. Each of these
claims is accompanied by continuation sheets ranging from approximately
1090 to 2423 in number. The Office production structure for
registration of claims simply does not accommodate such a time frame
for a single registration--group or otherwise--in a system which
registered nearly 661,500 claims in fiscal year 2004.
At the time the final rule on group registration of photographs was
announced in 2001, the Copyright Office did not predict that the amount
of staff time, equipment usage, and production materials that would be
required to produce certificates with a large number of continuation
sheets would prove so impracticable as to undermine the Office's
productivity. In view of recent claims that the Office has received,
including three claims of 2068, 2118 and 2423 pages respectively, as
well as other claims that it anticipates receiving should this
registration pattern take hold, the Office has determined that it must
now limit to 50 the number of continuation sheets that may accompany a
group registration for published photographs. The amended regulation
allows for 750 photos to be listed on the continuation sheets that are
part of the application and made part of the certificate of
registration, and permits the applicant to submit additional claims in
groups of 750 or fewer photographs with additional filing fees for
registration where the continuation sheet option is preferred.
Applicants may continue to submit
[[Page 15589]]
applications for group registration of photographs without any
limitation on the number of photographs if they select one of the
options that does not involve use of continuation sheets.
At some future time, the Office may be able to resume group
registration for photographs with an unlimited number of continuation
sheets. When the Office's business processing systems have been re-
engineered, new information technology systems will be employed to
accomplish much of the processing of claims digitally and it may at
that time be possible to liberalize the current restriction.
The Office is also clarifying that when an applicant for group
registration of photographs elects not to use continuation sheets to
identify dates of publication, the option that permits the dates of
publication to be identified ``on the deposited image'' does not
require that the date of publication appear on the deposited image
itself. In order to make this clear, Sec. 202.3(b)(9)(iv) is being
amended to state that the date of publication may be provided in any of
four different ways: Either (1) on each deposited image, (2) in a text
file on the CD-ROM or DVD that contains the deposited photographic
images, (3) on a list that accompanies the deposit and provides the
publication date for each image, or (4) on the continuation sheet
provided by the Copyright Office.
A notice and comment period is normally required prior to
promulgation of a regulation. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b). The Office has already conducted notice and comment on this
issue and has given this issue consideration in promulgating its final
rule (See Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Registration of Claims to
Copyright, Group Registration of Photographs, 65 FR at 26165 (May 5,
2000); Final Regulation, Registration of Claims to Copyright, Group
Registration of Photographs, 66 FR at 37148 (July 17, 2001).) That rule
concluded that the administrative burden of processing a group
registration of a large number of photos in excess of 500 would be
acceptable based on a projection of what such processing would involve.
66 FR 37148. As detailed above, however, actual experience has proved
otherwise. Based on recent experience, the Office has determined that
currently it is administratively unfeasible to continue to accept
applications for group registrations of photographs with more than 50
continuation sheets.
The APA waives the requirement for notice and comment when ``the
agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and
public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(B). It is impracticable to conduct
prepublication notice and comment where compliance with the normal APA
procedures would jeopardize the agency's assigned missions. See S. Rep.
No. 752, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. 14 (1945); S. Doc. No. 248, 79th Cong.,
2d Sess. 140, 148, 157 (1946). Although the Office provides a host of
other services, a primary duty of the Copyright Office is to register
claims to copyright. 17 U.S.C. 701(b); 410(a). Prompt registration is
central to the mission of the Office because it meets the needs of
applicants, obtains new works for Library of Congress collections, and
promotes creativity by effectively administering the national registry.
Providing notice and comment for this rulemaking would be
impracticable because it has become apparent that providing such notice
and awaiting and evaluating comments would have potentially serious
adverse impacts on the Office's ability to comply with its statutory
duties. At an increasing rate, the Office is receiving group photograph
claims with escalating numbers of continuation sheets. As noted above,
three recent claims have involved applications containing as many as
2423 pages. The Office cannot consistently process thousands of
continuation sheets with one claim and provide registration services
for the volume of claims it is charged with managing each year. Further
delay would aggravate the threat that this pattern will continue to
uncontrollable proportions, thus indicating that notice and comment
would in fact be counterproductive. If the Office provided prior notice
and comment for its rule limiting the number of photographs identified
on continuation sheets as part of a group claim, the delay would
exacerbate the present difficulties by permitting continued large
submissions and perhaps even encouraging a flurry of such submissions
in order to take advantage of the existing rules before the amendment's
effective date, jeopardizing even more the Office's ability to fulfill
its responsibility under the copyright law.
Specifically, pre-publication notice and comment would harm the
Office's registration processing function for the reason that the
continued submission of claims in this manner could affect the pendency
of overall registrations. The time between filing for registration and
receiving a registration certificate may increase, and the Office's
expense in processing these extremely large group registrations would
have no reasonable relationship to the fee charged. If the Office were
to devote a disproportionate amount of time to register such large
group claims, its ability to provide timely and cost effective service
to the public at large would be negatively affected. On the other hand,
from an applicant's point of view, the number limit is only being
placed on registrations made under one group option. The other options
will remain open for an unlimited number of photographs with one
application form and one filing fee, currently $30.00.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act also provides for a
notice of not less than 30 days before the effective date of a
regulation, except as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The reasons for
expedited rulemaking here are to ease an immediate administrative
burden and to forestall the likelihood of even further administrative
hardship. The Office has only recently begun to receive applications
for group registrations of photographs containing hundreds of
continuation sheets, but recent experience indicates that such
applications will continue to be received, perhaps at an increasing
pace. The Office cannot take the risk of becoming inundated with a
last-minute rush of large continuation-sheet submissions to take
advantage of the final days of the present rule. The amendment's
immediate effective date will preclude the submission of an
overwhelming number of late claims, which would further exacerbate the
negative effect such registrations have on the Copyright Office's
processing operations.
As part of the ``good cause'' calibration of the APA's section
553(d)(3), the necessity for immediate implementation must be balanced
against the necessity for affected persons to have a reasonable time to
prepare for the effective date of the new rule. To date, it appears
that the exceptionally large continuation sheet claims are being
submitted by only one entity. The Office is directly notifying that
entity of this amendment to the group registration regulation which has
been necessitated due to problems caused by registration in this
manner. For registration materials that have been received by the
Copyright Office before the effective date of this amendment but are
still being processed, the rules issued in 2001 will continue to apply,
although in particular cases, the Office may request that the applicant
resubmits separate applications, each with no more than 50 continuation
sheets. In such cases, no additional fees
[[Page 15590]]
will be assessed and the effective date of registration will be the
date the group of photographs was originally submitted in conformity
with then current regulations. With respect to any applications
including more than 50 continuation sheets that are received by the
Office on or after the effective date of this amendment, the applicant
will be given the option of obtaining a registration certificate that
does not include the continuation sheets, with the continuation sheets
being included with the deposit to identify the dates of publication of
the photographic images as permitted under Sec. 202.3(b)(9)(iv).
This amendment is therefore issued as a final rule effective on the
date it is published in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Copyright Office, though located in the Library of Congress and
part of the legislative branch, is not an ``agency'' subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612. Nevertheless, the
Register of Copyrights has considered the effect of a proposed
amendment on small businesses. This amendment continues to offer
photographers, who usually constitute small businesses, the ability to
register their copyrights in large groups for a modest fee while it
ensures that the Copyright Office can process those registrations in an
efficient manner and at a reasonable cost.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 202
Claims, Copyright.
Final Regulation
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office amends
37 CFR part 202 as follows:
PART 202--REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
0
1. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408, 702.
0
2. Section 202.3 is amended as follows:
0
(a) By revising paragraph (b)(9)(iv);
0
(b) By redesignating paragraphs (b)(9)(v) through (ix) as paragraphs
(vi) through (x); and
0
(c) By adding a new paragraph (b)(9)(v).
The additions and revisions to Sec. 202.3 read as follows:
Sec. 202.3 Registration of copyright.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(9) * * *
(iv) If the photographs in a group were all published on the same
date, the date of publication must be identified in space 3b of the
application. If the photographs in a group were not all published on
the same date, the range of dates of publication (e.g., February 15-
September 15, 2004) must be provided in space 3b of the application,
and the date of publication of each photograph within the group must be
identified either:
(A) On each deposited image;
(B) In a text file on the CD-ROM or DVD that contains the deposited
photographic images;
(C) On a list that accompanies the deposit and provides the
publication date for each image; or
(D) On a special continuation sheet provided by the Copyright
Office. Dates of publication must be provided in a way that clearly
identifies the date of publication for each individual photograph in
the group.
(v) If the applicant chooses to identify the date of publication
for each photograph in the group on a continuation sheet, the
application may include no more than 50 continuation sheets identifying
no more than 750 photographs. For these purposes, the applicant must
use the special continuation sheet for registration of a group of
photographs made available by the Copyright Office.
* * * * *
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
The Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 05-6059 Filed 3-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
Browse by Year
/ 2005
/ March
/ Monday, March 28, 2005
Internet Marketing - Phoenix Landscaping - Bankruptcy - Credit Cards
|
|