Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ May
/ Tuesday, May 13, 2008
[Federal Register: May 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 93)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27479-27481]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13my08-11]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0543; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-092-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Limited Model FU-24
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 27480]]
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0543;
Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-092-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand, which is the aviation
authority for New Zealand, has issued AD DCA/FU24/176C, dated September
27, 2007 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *
The MCAI requires inspections of the vertical fin for cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases or buckling and the repair of any
damaged area. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI
in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
The Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand, which is the aviation
authority for New Zealand, makes reference to Pacific Aerospace Limited
Chapter 05, page 25 of the FU-24-950 Series Maintenance Manual, issued
December 1978. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 2 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $160, or $80 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 24 work-hours and require parts costing $1,000, for a cost
of $2,920 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
[[Page 27481]]
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Pacific Aerospace Limited: Docket No. FAA-2008-0543; Directorate
Identifier 2007-CE-092-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by June 12, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to FU-24 airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *
The MCAI requires inspections of the vertical fin for cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases or buckling, and the repair of
any damaged area.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, after the effective date of this AD, do
the following actions following Chapter 05, page 25 of the FU-24-950
Series Maintenance Manual:
(1) Before the first flight of the day, visually inspect the
vertical stabilizer leading edge skin and fin for any cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases or buckling, and repair as
necessary. All non-transparent protective coatings and their
adhesive must be removed for this inspection.
(2) Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective
date of this AD and repetitively thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 100 hours TIS, perform a detailed inspection of the vertical
stabilizer leading edge skin, leading edge, fin skin, and the fin
forward attachment point for any cracking, corrosion, scratches,
dents, creases, or buckling to include:
(i) Inspection of the entire leading edge down to the forward
attach fitting; and removal of dorsal fin extensions if installed in
order to inspect the obscured areas of the fin.
(ii) Inspection of the fin skin for corrosion and cracks, paying
particular attention to the center rib rivet holes and the skin
joint at the fin base.
(iii) Inspection of the fin forward attachment point for
corrosion, removal of the fin tip, and inspection of the top rib for
cracks at the skin stiffener cut outs.
(3) If any damage is found during any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, obtain
an FAA-approved repair scheme from the manufacturer and incorporate
that repair.
(4) The following transparent polyurethane protective tapes have
been assessed as suitable for use to re-protect the leading edge and
may remain in situ for subsequent inspections, provided they are
sound and in a condition to permit visual inspection of the skin
beneath them:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 3M.................................... 8591, or 8671, 8672 and
8681HS (aeronautical
grade).
(ii) Scapa................................ Aeroshield P2604
(transparent).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1: You may apply for an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) for an alternative to the transparent polyurethane protective
tapes listed above.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
(1) The inspections required in this AD must be performed by a
person authorized under 14 CFR part 43 to perform inspections, as
opposed to the MCAI, which allows the holder of a pilot license to
perform the inspections.
(2) The 50-hour inspection required in the MCAI goes away
because the ``before each flight'' inspection captures the intent.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand AD
DCA/FU24/176C, dated September 27, 2007, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 6, 2008.
Margaret Kline,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-10649 Filed 5-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Browse by Year
/ 2008
/ May
/ Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Debt - Credit Card Consolidation - Hotel Las Vegas - Internet Marketing
|
|